On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:19:13 +0800, "Max" wrote:

Superb one, Ron !

My flawed attempt was due to an oversimplified interp g
on the spec's part of preserving the data if there's an "&" inside ..

I tried yours first, and when it didn't return what I thought the OP wanted, I
decided to work on it.

But I've posted many non-solutions due to misinterpretations of the
specifications, also sigh


--ron