Based on recent media stories, "soccer moms" who were blogging (positively)
about a product that they had received at little/no cost, but who failed to
disclose that fact, were coming under the scrutiny of the FTC. The reported
ruling sounded like it was being expanded to anyone who received any product
and said anything nice about it without disclosing that they had received it
at 'other-than-retail-cost'.

Better safe than sorry...


Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

"Dennis" wrote in message
...
Jeff,




I realize that this if off the subject, but why the disclaimer? Have you
had problems? And what do you mean by "You can thank the FTC of the USA
for
making this disclaimer possible/necessary."?

Thanks,

Dennis