View Single Post
  #3  
Old December 9th, 2009, 12:14 AM posted to microsoft.public.access.tablesdbdesign
Mr. B[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 171
Default Look up tables vs. value fields via combo box on form

Jill,

I think you have pretty much already answered your own question. However,
just to provide some validation to your thoughts, I use the table method for
storing lists of options when I know that there may be a need to allow the
user to add items to the list, disable certain items in the list, have a
sorting capability with in the list that is not based on the list values but
on numeric value assigned by the user.

I use a hard coded list (Value list) when there will never be any change to
the list of values and I can enter them in the order I wan them to appear.

I also use one other method for providing various list to be used in combo
boxes and/or list boxes. I create a table that I normally call
"tblListInfo". This table has a field that identifies the ListType, the
ListValue, the ListSortValue and the RecordID.

I can then filter the recods from this table an have it provide values for
multiple small list from the same table.

-----
HTH
Mr. B
http://www.askdoctoraccess.com/
Doctor Access Downloads Page:
http://www.askdoctoraccess.com/DownloadPage.htm


"Jill" wrote:

I have tables such as t_WeatherData in which I have fields such as
Temperature, WindSpeed, WindDirection. The WindSpeed and WindDirection
fields each have a lookup table with an ID (primary key/autonumber) and a
field that holds a category ("N", "NE", "NW", "W", etc., or " 5 mph", "5-10
mph", etc.). As I have it, the look up tables merely serve to populate a
combo box on the data entry form...

OR, is creating a combo box with a value list sufficient?

What should be the factors in my decision on when to use a look up table vs.
value list in a combo box? I can think of one and that would be to use look
up tables for those situations where more values may be added... It seems to
me tables are just the all around solution because if you have to make any
changes, it's much easier in a table... ? But I am aware that caution must
be exercised because if a category is changed (made more refined/specific,
for example), then that will apply to all previously entered data because of
the ID... but then this brings me to my next question:

In the case of using lookup tables... What determines whether to use the ID
in the data table vs. just the category descriptor? To illustrate, I could
have my selection of "NE" in the combobox for WindDirection input the ID
associated with it into the field in t_WeatherData, or "NE" itself can go
into the field. What's best? Does it really matter?

Thank you, and these are my last questions for a while! I hope they were as
clear as mud. ;-)

Jill