View Single Post
  #6  
Old April 28th, 2006, 07:06 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.formatting.longdocs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 'Read Only' Headings

I hope you are not sending important documents out to clients/customers in
Word format, period. Send them as printed documents or as pdf files.

If you do that, you can include instructions, mark them as "hidden text" and
they won't print or show up in the pdf version.
--
Charles Kenyon

Word New User FAQ & Web Directory: http://addbalance.com/word

Intermediate User's Guide to Microsoft Word (supplemented version of
Microsoft's Legal Users' Guide) http://addbalance.com/usersguide

See also the MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/ which is awesome!

My criminal defense site: http://addbalance.com
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
This message is posted to a newsgroup. Please post replies
and questions to the newsgroup so that others can learn
from my ignorance and your wisdom.


"Philamental" wrote in message
...

"Jezebel" wrote in message
...
It will work as effectively as any 'enforced' method you might try. In
theory you could put each heading and non-heading block in its own
section, then protect the heading sections. But you'll end up with a
shambles of a document in which the headers and footers behave strangely;
and you'll *really* confuse novice users. And the power users will defeat
your controls (which is trivially easy) on principle.


Thanks for your reply, Jezebel.

I understand what you're saying about putting the 'instruction' on the top
of the page, but I don't think it would be possible as the document is an
official one which will be sent to important clients, and such text would
be inappropriate to send out.

I'll have a quick look into your suggestion about protecting sections, but
I agree that it does seem a pretty OTT solution that may make more
problems than it solves.

When I originally posted, I expected there would not be a simple solution
but I just needed to make sure.

Thanks again for your reply.

Phil