View Single Post
  #9  
Old March 21st, 2010, 07:02 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Jim Robertson[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Custom Fields in Outlook (was Additional Phone Number Fields)

On 3/21/10 11:30 AM, in article ,
"Leonid S. Knyshov // SBS Expert"
wrote:

If you have Office Professional or Small Business, you already have BCM.
If not, it's a $149/seat SKU product. It does not require a dedicated
server as it is a light-weight application.


I have Office Standard. I don't know what other people in our business have,
but I think those who have Office have Standard. At the moment, we haven't
planned for those who don't have Office to buy it, relying instead on OWA
for them.

--snip--


The page to which I linked illustrates how it is done. In fact, now that
I think about it, I might simply build a commercial EMR solution on top
of it. Thanks for that idea.


I guess you haven't been on the same playground as the geniuses at CMS who
are implementing the "stimulus" portions of the "HiTech Act." They're
stumbling all over themselves trying to write so many regulations and
penalties that it's going to be a nightmare.

In any event, I'll look at BCM. Just so I understand, however: if I
struggled with InfoPath (or if someone who knew what he was doing used it as
a development tool), the result would require a SQL server, not just
SharePoint. Is that correct?

I REALLY appreciate your willingness to help me sort out what this is all
about.

Jim Robertson