View Single Post
  #2  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 09:03 PM posted to microsoft.public.access.tablesdbdesign
Jeff Boyce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,621
Default Proper Indexing of Table Fields

.... it depends ... G

If your table has a few thousand rows, if your database isn't split, if you
only have one user at a time, ...
you might not need indexing.

If you have 100's of thousands of rows, if the back-end/data is on a slow
LAN, in a db server, if ...
you might need indexing.

What performance differences have you seen when you tried it?

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

"QB" wrote in message
...
Correct me if I misunderstood, but I read that one should index fields
that
are used as criteria in queries.

With this in mind, when one does a caculated field in a query using
multiple
table fields, this means I should index each of these as well?

Ie:
(oldValue - newValue)/oldValue As PercentDiff

I should index oldValue and newValue?

Thank you,

QB