"Neil Ginsberg" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Mike Turco" wrote in message
news:lw3Hd.8274$nt.1238@fed1read06...

"Neil Ginsberg" wrote in message
news
I wrote we're using Access 2000, not 2002. I agree re. 2002/2003.

Neil,

I haven't seen anything new and great since A97. (A2 was 16 bit and A95
was a piece of junk.) I keep upgrading because all my customers upgrade.

I agree re. A97.

I think A97 was a real breakthrough in reliability. I'm not particularly
impressed with ADO, the ASP pages or any of this newer stuff. Unless you
have a specific reason to upgrade I would suggest that you stay with what
you have.

One concern is that A2000 is now 5 years old, and MS won't support things
indefinitely.

That's a really good point. I really like the backward compatibility of
Access, although its not quite perfect.

I have another client who ... [is] notorious for renaming objects as he
thinks of a better name. Drives me crazy!

Name game?


Well, the re-name game :-)

Mike