A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Powerpoint, Publisher and Visio » Publisher
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

What to Ask and How to Answer Questions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old February 15th, 2006, 10:20 PM posted to microsoft.public.publisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What to Ask and How to Answer Questions

Debbie,

I see you are back. You apparently also have trouble telling time.

Mike

Granny 3.1 wrote:
Unfortunatly the law didn't arrest my ex daughter in law as my son had hoped
they only warned her that a Sarah Balfour whom they have numerous complaints
against had her "sights" set on her and told her to have her ISP change her
IP address to prevent further harrassment. Oh, well, can't say he didn't try
to kill two birds with one stone. As for the Police Dept FBI says it's not
their juristriction and contacted them with all the info they have on
Sarah...which seems to be considerable they said and I'm quoting my
granddaughter so she might not have gotten it quite right she is only 8 "they
told mommy a cyber stalker was after her" Better luck next time. Maybe if
she changed her name to complain they would take her more seriously but it
seems they have a fat file of complaints against her and don't take any of
her complaints seriously as they have looked into and confirmed the
complaints against her. Almost midnight here, just thought you'd like to
know the results of her attempt at trying to be "sweet" the FBI saw right
thru that.

"Box134" wrote:


You're too late. Porkolotta has contacted the Amarillo Police department and
the FBI because someone sent her two e-mails five minutes apart. Coo-Coo!

"I've been sent two emails from people I don't know (one I think was a
'tester' for the other). Okay, that's not strictly true, the second I'm 99%
certain who the sender is and, because of the identical IP, I'm 95% certain
they're the same person. The first sender had the name of her location in
her
address, and the IP resolves to the same city (Amarillo, as it goes, but if
I
have any Tony Christie/Peter Kay impressions there will be consequences...).
It was someone I exposed as a liar, fraud and troll in another group and she
didn't like that much. The thing is, I never could convince her that US law
didn't apply in the UK (she was claiming, for example, that she wrote a
piece
of software, which was an obvious lie as she couldn't even get the name
right!)

The fact that they were sent within 5 minutes of each other, the identical
IPs and the style makes me think they're the same person, but I'd like to be
certain that two individuals couldn't be assigned the same IP.

Cheers
Sarah"

"Granny 3.1" wrote in message
news
How about we just hit them with the new law made just for this problem.
No
illegal posts, no insults, no untruths and no liable posts. I pray MS
will
give us their IP and email and I'll sick my lawyer (brother in law) on her
happily and sleep well at night knowing I did it the legal way.

Granny 3.1



  #42  
Old February 16th, 2006, 03:44 AM posted to microsoft.public.publisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What to Ask and How to Answer Questions

Debbie,

Do you really want your history posted so Google can collect it and save
it for posterity?

To be blunt, you should not have picked on Sarah in the method you did.
I pick on her for not being nice to posters, but I don't bring in her
personal life. You've gone farther and not only introduced this aspect,
but lied about it and then followed it up with personal e-mail that can
land you a very long-term jail sentence.

I suggest you crawl back into your hole and give up this battle you are
not going to win.

You've been nailed, DJ. Give it a rest before you need a crane to lift
yourself out of the hole you have dug.

Mike

Granny 3.1 wrote:
Yippeee!!! couldn't have heard better news if I had prayed for it. Way to go
parents...30 something and living at home. That's almost too pathetic to be
funny...almost. P.S. poor cat....run kitty, run!!!

"Box134" wrote:


This just in..... Sarah, aka Margolotta, has been kicked out of the house by
her father. Someone in her house messed with her Mac and she let them have
it between the eyes. So she said good bye to her Mac buddies and said she'd
be off the airwaves for a while. I'll believe it when I see it, or don't see
it, in this case. Probably the smartest thing her parents have done in a
long time.

Oh yes, she was admiring her cat's testicles a few days back.... need I say
more?



Margolotta wrote:

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:01:52 +0000, Erika wrote
You're one of those happy-clappy born again idiots aren't you? I can't do
with people like you. In a minute you'll be telling me that all I need to
do is let Jesus into my life and all my problems will miraculously
vanish. Xian ******** - I'm heartily sick of it. It's time you lot joined
the real world.




  #43  
Old February 16th, 2006, 07:39 PM posted to microsoft.public.publisher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What to Ask and How to Answer Questions

I couldn't agree more. Deborah Jean pointed me to these threads and I
don't think this is the image she really wants to portray to her
peers. It's a shame, actually, to see someone who started out as a
very professional, knowledgeable and helpful individual start spinning
out of control.

Deborah Jean: Always remember hatred has a way of ultimately turning
you into those you hate and if you continue, eventually there will be
those who start digging up old threads and seeking you out for attack.

Stop a moment and consider why Sarah flamed you in the first place.
I've followed the threads here and in other newsgroups from the
beginning and here's my unbiased viewpoint, which if you recall, you
asked for in another thread: Sarah may chastise posters but seldom
does she pull out the heavy duty flame thrower and go all out. I've
been around the newsgroups and Sarah long enough to know that she
doesn't randomly select someone for a 'full force flaming', those are
reserved for those who she feels deserves a good flaming and typically
this is someone who has flamed others for no good reason. Prior to
Sarah flaming you, you gave few folks in this newsgroup and in other
newsgroups a good flaming. If you flame then be prepared to be flamed
back.

Note I'm one who wishes everyone would get along so by no means do I
think flaming or chastising is acceptable, but I am capable of
understanding why flaming occurs and I also feel this situation needs
some perspective. I'm also hoping to save you from yourself.

And as a word of advice, you aren't posting in an exclusive forum. The
web interface to access the newsgroups on the Microsoft is only one
means of accessing Usenet. Folks from all over the world access the
newsgroups using a variety of newsreaders and web forums. So your
newsgroup posts are sent all over the world to thousands of news
servers and are viewed by a *lot* of individuals. Not just those who
are active in this forum, there are many lurkers watching and reading.
What I'm getting at is you have revealed enough personal information
about yourself in various posts which makes it easy to find personal
and private information on the Internet. I did a little searching just
to see how vulnerable you may be to attack and I found enough private
information that I'm certain you would not want to see it publicized.

I know you are doing what you feel is the 'right thing' but in the end
it will prove fruitless and ultimately cause you more damage. I'd like
to see the helpful and professional Debora Jean return and see Granny
3.1 leave for good.

~Beth Melton

"Mike Koewler" wrote in message
...

To be blunt, you should not have picked on Sarah in the method you
did. I pick on her for not being nice to posters, but I don't bring
in her personal life. You've gone farther and not only introduced
this aspect, but lied about it and then followed it up with personal
e-mail that can land you a very long-term jail sentence.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.