|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
October 29th, 2008, 03:03 PM
posted to microsoft.public.access
|
|||
|
|||
Performance Increase for Linking Tables?
If my DB is already 170Megs, and I need to add in another 50Megs, does it
make more sence to just Link the Tables into it instead? Are there drawbacks to doing this? 
|
|
#2
October 29th, 2008, 03:10 PM
posted to microsoft.public.access
|
|||
|
|||
|
Performance Increase for Linking Tables?
220 Mb really isn't that large for Access.
Do you need to be able to update the data? If so, then you probably should link, so that you don't have different versions of the same data floating around. -- Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP http://I.Am/DougSteele (no e-mails, please!) "stevescotthome" wrote in message ... If my DB is already 170Megs, and I need to add in another 50Megs, does it make more sence to just Link the Tables into it instead? Are there drawbacks to doing this?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
