|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
March 14th, 2006, 12:04 AM
posted to microsoft.public.access.reports
|
|||
|
|||
#name? access 2003
I have reports running fine under access 2000, but when I try to run the same
reports under Access 2003 I get #name? errors on the reports. This appears to happen for calculated variables only. What changed from 2000 to 2003 that makes my reports non-compatible? 
|
|
#2
March 14th, 2006, 01:22 AM
posted to microsoft.public.access.reports
|
|||
|
|||
|
#name? access 2003
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:04:27 -0800, rlw00069 wrote:
I have reports running fine under access 2000, but when I try to run the same reports under Access 2003 I get #name? errors on the reports. This appears to happen for calculated variables only. What changed from 2000 to 2003 that makes my reports non-compatible? The #Name error usually occurs when Access can not find a field referred to in it's control source. It could be a simple miss-spelling or a field that has had it's name changed, or a field name that includes a space in it and is not surrounded with brackets i.e. [Last Name], etc. You'll need to look. A few examples of the expressions used would have been helpful. -- Fred Please respond only to this newsgroup. I do not reply to personal e-mail
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Access 2002 vs. 2003 | Neil | General Discussions | 51 | February 16th, 2006 10:18 PM |
| Suggestion on updating Access 2000 to Access 2003 | Irshad Alam | General Discussion | 5 | August 10th, 2005 01:51 PM |
| What is the difference between 2002 and 2003? | Red Sonya | General Discussion | 2 | March 1st, 2005 05:10 AM |
| Access 2003 | RK | General Discussion | 12 | June 14th, 2004 10:16 AM |
| Access 2003 less functional than Access 97? | George Hester | General Discussion | 2 | June 4th, 2004 04:53 PM |
Linear Mode
