If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is
upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? Thanks! Neil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
Neil wrote:
We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? Thanks! Neil The 2003 series has provided several fixes over the 2002 version. -- Joe Obergfell Web Developer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
Thanks, Joe. Do you know, specifically, what those fixes are; or is there a
web site that lists them? The network guy will say that the fixes should be available as a service pack to 2002. Do you know if that's true? Thanks! Neil "Joe Obergfell" wrote in message ... Neil wrote: We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? Thanks! Neil The 2003 series has provided several fixes over the 2002 version. -- Joe Obergfell Web Developer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
Neil wrote:
Thanks, Joe. Do you know, specifically, what those fixes are; or is there a web site that lists them? The network guy will say that the fixes should be available as a service pack to 2002. Do you know if that's true? Thanks! Neil "Joe Obergfell" wrote in message ... Neil wrote: We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? Thanks! Neil The 2003 series has provided several fixes over the 2002 version. -- Joe Obergfell Web Developer I am not sure what the fixes are, but they were major fixes. I believe if you go to Microsoft Office's site and then to Access, you should be able to search for what the fixes have been. The network guy is right, These fixes from 2002 to 2003 will be as service packs for 2002, but to save time, 2003 would be quicker. It is all a matter of time vs possible price. I am not sure if there is a difference in price but if there is, you would pay through time, if not in price. -- Joe Obergfell Web Developer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our
application, and I want to do it in 2003. I also like 2003. Things like themed controls make the software look a LOT better. here is some screen shots of what I mean http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKal...icles/Grid.htm and http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKal...heme/index.htm Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? No, you are not. I can't see any good reason, or argument to upgrade here. The only reason would be that you "like" a2003 better..... There is little, if any changes in terms of support for sql server....so, no, there is no big real argument here that I can make a case. However, see below for a2003 features (this is a reposted message) Also, here is a fabulous post by MVP John Viescas on this very subject late last year. (This was comparing Access 2003 to 2002). They didn't make any major changes. Here's a summary: View information on object dependencies In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can view information on dependencies between database objects. Viewing a list of objects that use a specific object helps maintain a database over time and avoid errors related to missing record sources. For example, the Quarterly Orders query in the Sales database is no longer needed, but before deleting it, you might want to find out which other objects in the database use the query. Then, you could either change the record source of the dependent objects, or delete them, before deleting the Quarterly Orders query. Viewing a complete list of dependent objects helps you save time and minimize errors. In addition to viewing the list of objects that are bound to a selected object, you can also view the objects that are being used by the selected object. Macros, modules, and data access pages are not searched for dependencies. Access projects do not support this feature. Error checking in forms and reports In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can enable automatic error checking for common errors in forms and reports. Error checking points out errors, such as two controls using the same keyboard shortcut, and the width of a report being greater than the page it will be printed on. Enabling error checking helps you identify errors and correct them. Propagating field properties In previous versions of Microsoft Access, whenever you modified a field's inherited property, you had to manually modify the property of the corresponding control in each of the forms and reports. Now, when you modify an inherited field property in Table design view, Access displays an option to update the property of all or some controls that are bound to the field. Smart tags In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can use the SmartTags property to add a smart tag to any field in a table, query, form, report, or data access page in a database. Back up a database or project You can back up the current database or project before making major changes to it. The backup will be saved in the default backup location, or in the current folder. To restore a database, go to the location of the backup, rename the file, and open it in Access. Windows XP theme support The Microsoft Windows XP operating system offers you several themes. If you have chosen a theme other than the default, Access will apply the chosen theme to views, dialog boxes, and controls. You can prevent form controls from inheriting themes from the operating system by setting an option on the database or project. Improved sorting in controls You can now specify the ascending or descending sort order of up to four fields in the List Box and Combo Box Wizards in forms and reports, and the Lookup Wizard in an Access database. The sort page added to these wizards looks and behaves like the sort page in the Report Wizard. Autocorrect options In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you have more control over the behavior of the AutoCorrect feature. The AutoCorrect Options button appears near text that was automatically corrected. If you find on occasion that you don't want text to be corrected, you can undo a correction or turn AutoCorrect options on or off by clicking the button and making a selection. Enhanced font capabilities in SQL views In the SQL and query Design views of a query in both a Microsoft Access database and Microsoft Access project, you can now change the font and font size of the text by using the Query design font option added to the Tables/Queries tab of the Options dialog box under the Tools menu. These settings apply to all databases and work with the high-contrast and other accessibility settings of your computer. Context-based Help in SQL view In the SQL view of a query in a Microsoft Access database, you can now get help specific to Jet SQL keywords, VBA functions, and Access functions. Simply press F1 to bring up the help that corresponds to the text near the cursor. You can also search the Jet SQL and VBA function reference topics. Importing, exporting, and linking Importing, exporting, and linking to a Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services list from Access You can perform the following operations with a Windows SharePoint Services list: ?Export the contents of a table or a query to a list. ?Import the contents of a list into a table. ?Link a table to a list. Exporting and linking to Access data from Windows SharePoint Services You can now export a list in its Datasheet view from Windows SharePoint Services to a static table or to a linked table in Access. When you export to a static table, you create a table in Access. You can then view and make changes to the table independent of the original list in Windows SharePoint Services. Similarly, you can change the list in Windows SharePoint Services, and that will not affect the table in Access. When you export to a linked table, you create a table in Access and establish a dynamic link between the table and the list such that changes to the table are reflected in the list, and changes to the list are reflected in the table as well. Make a local table from a linked table In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can make a local copy of the structure or data and structure contained in a linked table. XML support With the enhanced XML support in Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can specify a transform file when you import data from or export data to XML. The transform is then applied automatically. When you import XML data, the transform is applied to the data as soon as the data is imported, before any new table is created or an existing one is appended to. When you export data to XML, the transform is applied following the export operation. Often times a database contains lookup values that are stored in another database. You can now include these related tables when exporting. You can also include any predefined filter or sort order for an object when exporting the object. Security enhancements Macro Security Microsoft Office Access 2003 allows you to protect against potentially unsafe Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) code by setting the macro security level. You can set the security level so that you are prompted every time that you open a database containing VBA code, or you can automatically block databases that are from unknown sources. Additionally, Access uses Microsoft Authenticode technology to enable you to digitally sign a macro project by using a digital certificate. The certificate used to create this signature confirms that the macro originated from the signer, and the signature confirms that it has not been altered. When you set the macro security level, you can run macros based on whether they are digitally signed by a developer on your list of trusted sources. Block Potentially Unsafe Functions Access utilizes the Microsoft Jet Expression Service enhanced sandbox mode to block potentially unsafe functions from being used in expressions. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
I don't see much difference between the two versions. The next version of
Access/Office will be DRAMATICALLY different. You may love it or you may hate it but everything you think you know about the Office interface you will need to relearn. So, my feeling is rather than fight to spend the money for O2003 licenses now, use the O2002 licenses and fight for the upgrade in next year's budget. Once you get past the interface changes, there are some awesome new features coming up in Access. "Neil" wrote in message ink.net... We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? Thanks! Neil |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
"Neil" wrote:
We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Note that most of your users only need the runtime version of Access. Your power users who create queries will want a full version of Access. Furthermore you can easily use the new features of Access but create A2002 MDEs (using A2002) to distribute to your users. Standard blurb follows. I'd also strongly suggest your network guy stage his upgrades. This month Win 2003 Server. Next month or two SQL Server. Later for Office. Besides those upgrades really don't care about the server. Hmm, the more I think about this, if he really wants to do all those upgrades at the same time, he's an utter idiot. Tony Been working in A2003 and I really like the smart tags Access pops up on the controls For example I added some &s to some unassociated labels. Access promptly tells me they're unassociated and gives me an option to associate the label to a control. Nice. Or if you've renamed fields in the tables the controls based on the old names are obviously incorrect. Now a little triangle appears in the corner. Again nice. I created a report and I see a little flag in that little grey box in the upper left hand corner of the report. I click on it and see a "Common Report Error" "Report width is greater than page width" with a bunch of options. Someone spent some time on these little touches. Oh, I'm developing in A2003. But the users will be given an A2000 MDE. So long as I use no new features I should be fine with that. Very nice. I can see how this would help the newbie/itinerant Access users. I also see lots of flags for the label controls in the headers of new reports. They're a bit of a pain but they are also easily ignored. They won't appear once you close and reopen the report. -- Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can read the entire thread of messages. Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
If the 2003 fixes are available as 2002 service packs, I'm sure they'd go
with the SPs. It seems that there are no license packs for upgrades, so the price to upgrade office is steep -- $410 a pop for Office Pro 2003 and $185 a pop for Access 2003 alone (that, in contrast to the fact that the Access 2003 off-the-shelf upgrade can be gotten for about $85 a box). So at 35 seats, it's a chunk of change to upgrade to Access 2003, which I'm sure they'd avoid with SPs, if they're the same. Neil "Joe Obergfell" wrote in message ... Neil wrote: Thanks, Joe. Do you know, specifically, what those fixes are; or is there a web site that lists them? The network guy will say that the fixes should be available as a service pack to 2002. Do you know if that's true? Thanks! Neil "Joe Obergfell" wrote in message ... Neil wrote: We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? Thanks! Neil The 2003 series has provided several fixes over the 2002 version. -- Joe Obergfell Web Developer I am not sure what the fixes are, but they were major fixes. I believe if you go to Microsoft Office's site and then to Access, you should be able to search for what the fixes have been. The network guy is right, These fixes from 2002 to 2003 will be as service packs for 2002, but to save time, 2003 would be quicker. It is all a matter of time vs possible price. I am not sure if there is a difference in price but if there is, you would pay through time, if not in price. -- Joe Obergfell Web Developer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
Thanks. Since we are looking to rework our app, I think whatever version we
go to will be it for a while. I like the idea of going with 2002/2003, since it will require less reworking of code than the next version of Access will require. So, if there's not that much of a difference between 2002/3, then I guess 2002 is it! Thanks again. Neil "Pat Hartman(MVP)" wrote in message ... I don't see much difference between the two versions. The next version of Access/Office will be DRAMATICALLY different. You may love it or you may hate it but everything you think you know about the Office interface you will need to relearn. So, my feeling is rather than fight to spend the money for O2003 licenses now, use the O2002 licenses and fight for the upgrade in next year's budget. Once you get past the interface changes, there are some awesome new features coming up in Access. "Neil" wrote in message ink.net... We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server at the same time. We're moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that. I've been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? Thanks! Neil |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Access 2002 vs. 2003
Thanks for this, Albert. I'll review it in detail.
One thing I'm wondering, though: Access 2003 uses a new file format (with the ability to still use the Access 2000/2002 format). So that seems like a major change to me. Or is that not a big deal? Thanks, Neil "Albert D.Kallal" wrote in message ... We are also looking to do a fair amount of redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003. I also like 2003. Things like themed controls make the software look a LOT better. here is some screen shots of what I mean http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKal...icles/Grid.htm and http://www.members.shaw.ca/AlbertKal...heme/index.htm Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003? No, you are not. I can't see any good reason, or argument to upgrade here. The only reason would be that you "like" a2003 better..... There is little, if any changes in terms of support for sql server....so, no, there is no big real argument here that I can make a case. However, see below for a2003 features (this is a reposted message) Also, here is a fabulous post by MVP John Viescas on this very subject late last year. (This was comparing Access 2003 to 2002). They didn't make any major changes. Here's a summary: View information on object dependencies In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can view information on dependencies between database objects. Viewing a list of objects that use a specific object helps maintain a database over time and avoid errors related to missing record sources. For example, the Quarterly Orders query in the Sales database is no longer needed, but before deleting it, you might want to find out which other objects in the database use the query. Then, you could either change the record source of the dependent objects, or delete them, before deleting the Quarterly Orders query. Viewing a complete list of dependent objects helps you save time and minimize errors. In addition to viewing the list of objects that are bound to a selected object, you can also view the objects that are being used by the selected object. Macros, modules, and data access pages are not searched for dependencies. Access projects do not support this feature. Error checking in forms and reports In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can enable automatic error checking for common errors in forms and reports. Error checking points out errors, such as two controls using the same keyboard shortcut, and the width of a report being greater than the page it will be printed on. Enabling error checking helps you identify errors and correct them. Propagating field properties In previous versions of Microsoft Access, whenever you modified a field's inherited property, you had to manually modify the property of the corresponding control in each of the forms and reports. Now, when you modify an inherited field property in Table design view, Access displays an option to update the property of all or some controls that are bound to the field. Smart tags In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can use the SmartTags property to add a smart tag to any field in a table, query, form, report, or data access page in a database. Back up a database or project You can back up the current database or project before making major changes to it. The backup will be saved in the default backup location, or in the current folder. To restore a database, go to the location of the backup, rename the file, and open it in Access. Windows XP theme support The Microsoft Windows XP operating system offers you several themes. If you have chosen a theme other than the default, Access will apply the chosen theme to views, dialog boxes, and controls. You can prevent form controls from inheriting themes from the operating system by setting an option on the database or project. Improved sorting in controls You can now specify the ascending or descending sort order of up to four fields in the List Box and Combo Box Wizards in forms and reports, and the Lookup Wizard in an Access database. The sort page added to these wizards looks and behaves like the sort page in the Report Wizard. Autocorrect options In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you have more control over the behavior of the AutoCorrect feature. The AutoCorrect Options button appears near text that was automatically corrected. If you find on occasion that you don't want text to be corrected, you can undo a correction or turn AutoCorrect options on or off by clicking the button and making a selection. Enhanced font capabilities in SQL views In the SQL and query Design views of a query in both a Microsoft Access database and Microsoft Access project, you can now change the font and font size of the text by using the Query design font option added to the Tables/Queries tab of the Options dialog box under the Tools menu. These settings apply to all databases and work with the high-contrast and other accessibility settings of your computer. Context-based Help in SQL view In the SQL view of a query in a Microsoft Access database, you can now get help specific to Jet SQL keywords, VBA functions, and Access functions. Simply press F1 to bring up the help that corresponds to the text near the cursor. You can also search the Jet SQL and VBA function reference topics. Importing, exporting, and linking Importing, exporting, and linking to a Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services list from Access You can perform the following operations with a Windows SharePoint Services list: ?Export the contents of a table or a query to a list. ?Import the contents of a list into a table. ?Link a table to a list. Exporting and linking to Access data from Windows SharePoint Services You can now export a list in its Datasheet view from Windows SharePoint Services to a static table or to a linked table in Access. When you export to a static table, you create a table in Access. You can then view and make changes to the table independent of the original list in Windows SharePoint Services. Similarly, you can change the list in Windows SharePoint Services, and that will not affect the table in Access. When you export to a linked table, you create a table in Access and establish a dynamic link between the table and the list such that changes to the table are reflected in the list, and changes to the list are reflected in the table as well. Make a local table from a linked table In Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can make a local copy of the structure or data and structure contained in a linked table. XML support With the enhanced XML support in Microsoft Office Access 2003, you can specify a transform file when you import data from or export data to XML. The transform is then applied automatically. When you import XML data, the transform is applied to the data as soon as the data is imported, before any new table is created or an existing one is appended to. When you export data to XML, the transform is applied following the export operation. Often times a database contains lookup values that are stored in another database. You can now include these related tables when exporting. You can also include any predefined filter or sort order for an object when exporting the object. Security enhancements Macro Security Microsoft Office Access 2003 allows you to protect against potentially unsafe Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) code by setting the macro security level. You can set the security level so that you are prompted every time that you open a database containing VBA code, or you can automatically block databases that are from unknown sources. Additionally, Access uses Microsoft Authenticode technology to enable you to digitally sign a macro project by using a digital certificate. The certificate used to create this signature confirms that the macro originated from the signer, and the signature confirms that it has not been altered. When you set the macro security level, you can run macros based on whether they are digitally signed by a developer on your list of trusted sources. Block Potentially Unsafe Functions Access utilizes the Microsoft Jet Expression Service enhanced sandbox mode to block potentially unsafe functions from being used in expressions. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opening an Access 2003 database using Access 2002. | Chantel | General Discussion | 2 | September 1st, 2005 07:15 PM |
Book recommendations, please | Top Spin | New Users | 2 | March 1st, 2005 12:43 AM |
reports created with access 2002 do not work in access 2003? | Jerry Z | Setting Up & Running Reports | 1 | September 24th, 2004 07:27 AM |
Access 2000 DB in Access 2002 | Tony_VBACoder | General Discussion | 2 | July 28th, 2004 01:23 AM |
Access 2002 - 2003 and XP | Joseph Meehan | General Discussion | 1 | June 12th, 2004 07:00 PM |