If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Office 2000 vs Office 2003
I'm looking to put all my users on to the same version of
office... currently have 97,2000, 2002 & 2003 !! I've only used office 97 so if anyone has any comments / advice about which I should go for I'd be grateful. The thinking is to go with 2000 as its an older product.... but I do have 4 new PC's with Office 2003 loaded on them. Is 2003 stable and secure enough yet? The needs are basic office admin stuff and well as some vba add ins I've created. Licences aren't an issue as will spend to sort it all out Any help would be wonderful. Thanks. M. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Office 2000 vs Office 2003
From what I've seen, Office 2003 is stable. It appears that Microsoft did
more "bug fixing" than adding features when they went from XP (aka. 2002) to 2003, but there are some new features added in both 2002 and 2003. Also, for Access, the default file format for 2000, 2002, and 2003 is the 2000 file format. There is also a 2002/2003 file format support by the 2 newer versions. The help files are much better in your 97 version, so you may want to keep a copy of it around and loaded so that you can use them. The 2003 help files are much better than the 2000 and 2002 help files, but the interface to get to the help is a pain. It defaults to an online help in the applications (but not in the VBA editor), which allows Microsoft to keep the topics up to date and corrected, but is slow and the search engine running it is definitely NOT "Google". In the VBA editor, if you go Help|Microsoft Visual Basic Help, you will get an interface similar to the old help, but still missing a couple of features. -- Wayne Morgan Microsoft Access MVP "Mart" wrote in message ... I'm looking to put all my users on to the same version of office... currently have 97,2000, 2002 & 2003 !! I've only used office 97 so if anyone has any comments / advice about which I should go for I'd be grateful. The thinking is to go with 2000 as its an older product.... but I do have 4 new PC's with Office 2003 loaded on them. Is 2003 stable and secure enough yet? The needs are basic office admin stuff and well as some vba add ins I've created. Licences aren't an issue as will spend to sort it all out Any help would be wonderful. Thanks. M. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Office 2000 vs Office 2003
Thanks very much for that
M. -----Original Message----- From what I've seen, Office 2003 is stable. It appears that Microsoft did more "bug fixing" than adding features when they went from XP (aka. 2002) to 2003, but there are some new features added in both 2002 and 2003. Also, for Access, the default file format for 2000, 2002, and 2003 is the 2000 file format. There is also a 2002/2003 file format support by the 2 newer versions. The help files are much better in your 97 version, so you may want to keep a copy of it around and loaded so that you can use them. The 2003 help files are much better than the 2000 and 2002 help files, but the interface to get to the help is a pain. It defaults to an online help in the applications (but not in the VBA editor), which allows Microsoft to keep the topics up to date and corrected, but is slow and the search engine running it is definitely NOT "Google". In the VBA editor, if you go Help|Microsoft Visual Basic Help, you will get an interface similar to the old help, but still missing a couple of features. -- Wayne Morgan Microsoft Access MVP "Mart" wrote in message ... I'm looking to put all my users on to the same version of office... currently have 97,2000, 2002 & 2003 !! I've only used office 97 so if anyone has any comments / advice about which I should go for I'd be grateful. The thinking is to go with 2000 as its an older product.... but I do have 4 new PC's with Office 2003 loaded on them. Is 2003 stable and secure enough yet? The needs are basic office admin stuff and well as some vba add ins I've created. Licences aren't an issue as will spend to sort it all out Any help would be wonderful. Thanks. M. . |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Office 2000 vs Office 2003
"Mart" wrote
The thinking is to go with 2000 as its an older product.... but I do have 4 new PC's with Office 2003 loaded on them. Access 2000 was, arguably, the buggiest-ever release of Access. It has had three Service Releases and there are still unresolved issues. To top it off, it is out of service, now, so you can't expect any more fixes. Many of those issues were resolved in Access 2002, and more were resolved in Access 2003. I cannot imagine that you would want to _start_ using an out-of-service product -- one for which you can't expect full support, even for fee, from Microsoft. As Wayne said, Access 2003 seems stable (though with any product this complex, don't ever expect any release to be completely bug-free). Larry Linson Microsoft Access MVP |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Office 2003 / Office XP Shortcut Bar | Marc Bressman | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 6 | June 26th, 2004 08:42 AM |
Continual Error 1321 Trying to Install Office 2003 | Chad Harris | General Discussions | 9 | June 11th, 2004 08:19 AM |
Installing Outook 2003 over Exhange Server Based Client running Win2K Prof and Office 2000 | joe smith | Installation & Setup | 3 | June 9th, 2004 03:44 PM |
Productkey problem when installing office 2003 on network | Stefan Schreurs | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 1 | June 1st, 2004 11:16 PM |
office 2000 remove tools | bud | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 1 | May 27th, 2004 10:40 AM |