If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Attempted Simultaneous Access causes "Could not lock file"
I have a screen scraper written in perl that populates the same database
every night with new additional information. Why is it that when I try to simultaneously write to the database with perl and read it with my ASP.NET UI I get "could not lock file" from ASP.NET? Thanks, Siegfried |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Siegfried Heintze wrote:
I have a screen scraper written in perl that populates the same database every night with new additional information. Why is it that when I try to simultaneously write to the database with perl and read it with my ASP.NET UI I get "could not lock file" from ASP.NET? Thanks, Siegfried I don't know the details of your system, but this behavior seems quite reasonable. If ASP.NET needs exclusive use of some resource (such as your database), and some other process currently has access to the resource, then ASP.NET should definitely have to wait until nobody else is using it. Maybe you can schedule the activities for different times. -- Vincent Johns Please feel free to quote anything I say here. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm.... the ASP.NET application is only reading.
I can have multiple perl programs writing to the database, simultaneously. I wrote both programs. One of the most important features of a database, I thought, was simultaneous access by multiple processes. The perl code is just doing "INSERT"s and the ASP.NET is only doing Selects. Is there not some setting that needs to be adjusted to allow multiple readers and writers? I understand that the MSAccess GUI needs exclusive access when editing a table definition, but I'm not doing that. Thanks, Siegfried "Vincent Johns" wrote in message k.net... Siegfried Heintze wrote: I have a screen scraper written in perl that populates the same database every night with new additional information. Why is it that when I try to simultaneously write to the database with perl and read it with my ASP.NET UI I get "could not lock file" from ASP.NET? Thanks, Siegfried I don't know the details of your system, but this behavior seems quite reasonable. If ASP.NET needs exclusive use of some resource (such as your database), and some other process currently has access to the resource, then ASP.NET should definitely have to wait until nobody else is using it. Maybe you can schedule the activities for different times. -- Vincent Johns Please feel free to quote anything I say here. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Siegfried Heintze wrote:
Hmmm.... the ASP.NET application is only reading. I can have multiple perl programs writing to the database, simultaneously. I wrote both programs. One of the most important features of a database, I thought, was simultaneous access by multiple processes. No. Any simultaneous "write" access is only to different parts of the same database, such as separate records. If two processes attempt simultaneous changes to the same field, someone's work is likely to be trashed -- the field will contain only one value at the end, regardless of how many processes tried to change it. In Access, multiple processes might access separate records, but any one record is modifiable by only one process at a time, and it must release the record before the other process can change it. (It often doesn't even make sense for the 2nd process to have read-only access to the record, as the fields could easily be inconsistent up to the time the 1st process finishes writing and releases the record lock.) The perl code is just doing "INSERT"s and the ASP.NET is only doing Selects. Is there not some setting that needs to be adjusted to allow multiple readers and writers? I don't know, but my guess is that Perl needs to explicitly release each record after it finishes writing that record. Perhaps it's neglecting to unlock records. Is all this behavior new? If it is, did you change some of the code just before you noticed it? You might want to return to a previous version to try to identify the cause of the problem. I understand that the MSAccess GUI needs exclusive access when editing a table definition, but I'm not doing that. It probably needs exclusive access to the entire Table if it's modifying the Table's structure! I'd want exclusive access to the entire database if I were doing that, and for long enough to check the results for accuracy and consistency. But for editing the contents of a set of records, you probably need exclusive access only to the records being modified. Are you defining transactions on which you may at times perform Commit or Rollback operations? Any resources (e.g. records in Tables) involved in those will temporarily belong exclusively to some process, I expect. If the ONLY operation that any process wants to perform is reading, then there shouldn't be any need for any exclusive access. But you said that the Perl code is writing, too, so it does need to exclude other processes. I think the main question is how it's accomplishing that, and under what conditions it allows other processes to read. Thanks, Siegfried "Vincent Johns" wrote in message k.net... Siegfried Heintze wrote: I have a screen scraper written in perl that populates the same database every night with new additional information. Why is it that when I try to simultaneously write to the database with perl and read it with my ASP.NET UI I get "could not lock file" from ASP.NET? Thanks, Siegfried I don't know the details of your system, but this behavior seems quite reasonable. If ASP.NET needs exclusive use of some resource (such as your database), and some other process currently has access to the resource, then ASP.NET should definitely have to wait until nobody else is using it. Maybe you can schedule the activities for different times. -- Vincent Johns Please feel free to quote anything I say here. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Attempted Simultaneous Access causes "Could not lock file"
Thanks for your thoughful response, Vincent.
Presently I have one of the perl programs running collecting data and storing it in my MSAccess database. It has been running since 11PM last night. I just wrote another test perl program and pasted in the massive SELECT statement from my C# aspx code into the perl test code. The perl test code runs fine. Can we infer from this test that there is nothing wrong with the perl code and there is something in my C#/ASPX connection string that needs adjustment? I also tried convering my aspx from ole to odbc. This did not help. The symptoms are the same: no problem as long as perl is not writing to the database. Is this behavior new? Hmmm.... I've never been able to make simultaneous access work between C# and Perl. Any thoughts? Thanks, Siegfried "Vincent Johns" wrote in message ink.net... Siegfried Heintze wrote: Hmmm.... the ASP.NET application is only reading. I can have multiple perl programs writing to the database, simultaneously. I wrote both programs. One of the most important features of a database, I thought, was simultaneous access by multiple processes. No. Any simultaneous "write" access is only to different parts of the same database, such as separate records. If two processes attempt simultaneous changes to the same field, someone's work is likely to be trashed -- the field will contain only one value at the end, regardless of how many processes tried to change it. In Access, multiple processes might access separate records, but any one record is modifiable by only one process at a time, and it must release the record before the other process can change it. (It often doesn't even make sense for the 2nd process to have read-only access to the record, as the fields could easily be inconsistent up to the time the 1st process finishes writing and releases the record lock.) The perl code is just doing "INSERT"s and the ASP.NET is only doing Selects. Is there not some setting that needs to be adjusted to allow multiple readers and writers? I don't know, but my guess is that Perl needs to explicitly release each record after it finishes writing that record. Perhaps it's neglecting to unlock records. Is all this behavior new? If it is, did you change some of the code just before you noticed it? You might want to return to a previous version to try to identify the cause of the problem. I understand that the MSAccess GUI needs exclusive access when editing a table definition, but I'm not doing that. It probably needs exclusive access to the entire Table if it's modifying the Table's structure! I'd want exclusive access to the entire database if I were doing that, and for long enough to check the results for accuracy and consistency. But for editing the contents of a set of records, you probably need exclusive access only to the records being modified. Are you defining transactions on which you may at times perform Commit or Rollback operations? Any resources (e.g. records in Tables) involved in those will temporarily belong exclusively to some process, I expect. If the ONLY operation that any process wants to perform is reading, then there shouldn't be any need for any exclusive access. But you said that the Perl code is writing, too, so it does need to exclude other processes. I think the main question is how it's accomplishing that, and under what conditions it allows other processes to read. Thanks, Siegfried "Vincent Johns" wrote in message k.net... Siegfried Heintze wrote: I have a screen scraper written in perl that populates the same database every night with new additional information. Why is it that when I try to simultaneously write to the database with perl and read it with my ASP.NET UI I get "could not lock file" from ASP.NET? Thanks, Siegfried I don't know the details of your system, but this behavior seems quite reasonable. If ASP.NET needs exclusive use of some resource (such as your database), and some other process currently has access to the resource, then ASP.NET should definitely have to wait until nobody else is using it. Maybe you can schedule the activities for different times. -- Vincent Johns Please feel free to quote anything I say here. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Attempted Simultaneous Access causes "Could not lock file"
Siegfried Heintze wrote:
Thanks for your thoughful response, Vincent. Presently I have one of the perl programs running collecting data and storing it in my MSAccess database. It has been running since 11PM last night. I just wrote another test perl program and pasted in the massive SELECT statement from my C# aspx code into the perl test code. The perl test code runs fine. Can we infer from this test that there is nothing wrong with the perl code and there is something in my C#/ASPX connection string that needs adjustment? I'm not familiar enough with either ASPX or Perl to give much advice here, but it still looks like a locking problem to me. Can you get ASPX to give you more detailed information about exactly what went wrong? I also tried convering my aspx from ole to odbc. This did not help. The symptoms are the same: no problem as long as perl is not writing to the database. Can you get the Perl program to release its control of the database on a periodic basis (such as once every five seconds) to let other processes such as ASPX access it? -- Vincent Johns Please feel free to quote anything I say here. Is this behavior new? Hmmm.... I've never been able to make simultaneous access work between C# and Perl. Any thoughts? Thanks, Siegfried |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Attempted Simultaneous Access causes "Could not lock file"
Vincent,
I coded yet another ASP.NET web page using odbc instead of OleDB and used a datareader instead of an adapter. I die when I try to open the connection. Here is the error message that only occures when the Perl program is running: ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [IM006] [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's SQLSetConnectAttr failed ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Could not use '(unknown)'; file already in use. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Could not use '(unknown)'; file already in use. Thanks, Siegfried P.S.Here is the connection string: Driver={Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)};Dbq=C:\Inetpub\heintze\keyword-job-search\job-search-usa.mdb;Uid=Ad min;Pwd=;" "Vincent Johns" wrote in message ink.net... Siegfried Heintze wrote: Thanks for your thoughful response, Vincent. Presently I have one of the perl programs running collecting data and storing it in my MSAccess database. It has been running since 11PM last night. I just wrote another test perl program and pasted in the massive SELECT statement from my C# aspx code into the perl test code. The perl test code runs fine. Can we infer from this test that there is nothing wrong with the perl code and there is something in my C#/ASPX connection string that needs adjustment? I'm not familiar enough with either ASPX or Perl to give much advice here, but it still looks like a locking problem to me. Can you get ASPX to give you more detailed information about exactly what went wrong? I also tried convering my aspx from ole to odbc. This did not help. The symptoms are the same: no problem as long as perl is not writing to the database. Can you get the Perl program to release its control of the database on a periodic basis (such as once every five seconds) to let other processes such as ASPX access it? -- Vincent Johns Please feel free to quote anything I say here. Is this behavior new? Hmmm.... I've never been able to make simultaneous access work between C# and Perl. Any thoughts? Thanks, Siegfried |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Attempted Simultaneous Access causes "Could not lock file"
Sorry, I've not seen this message and am not familiar enough with Perl
to help. Have you checked Microsoft's Web site for these kinds of errror? (They still look like a locking conflict to me, but I can't say much beyond that.) -- Vincent Johns Please feel free to quote anything I say here. Siegfried Heintze wrote: Vincent, I coded yet another ASP.NET web page using odbc instead of OleDB and used a datareader instead of an adapter. I die when I try to open the connection. Here is the error message that only occures when the Perl program is running: ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [IM006] [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's SQLSetConnectAttr failed ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Could not use '(unknown)'; file already in use. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Unable to open registry key 'Temporary (volatile) Jet DSN for process 0x1454 Thread 0x12b0 DBC 0x158128c Jet'. ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Could not use '(unknown)'; file already in use. Thanks, Siegfried P.S.Here is the connection string: Driver={Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)};Dbq=C:\Inetpub\heintze\keyword-job-search\job-search-usa.mdb;Uid=Ad min;Pwd=;" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ambiguous Name Error | pm | Using Forms | 10 | June 5th, 2005 09:19 PM |
2002 vs 2003 | Patrick Stubbin | General Discussion | 2 | May 17th, 2005 07:27 AM |
The "Right" web hosting for data access pages?? | Ron Ehrlich | General Discussion | 9 | May 6th, 2005 05:49 AM |
is Access 2003 any better than XP? | Gorb | General Discussion | 4 | November 11th, 2004 09:44 PM |
is Access 2003 any better than XP? | Gorb | Using Forms | 2 | November 11th, 2004 09:20 AM |