If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Advice about Master documents
Hi (using Word 2002 in XP).
I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Thanks for any suggestions and ideas. -- Jeff Stevens Email address deliberately false to avoid spam |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1. Yes, Master/Subs in Word still sucks.
2. Don't worry about corruption of your one document. Instead, why don't you turn on creating a backup file under Tools--Options, Save tab? 3. How big is your document? When I was writing my book, I used the document map feature to move around 'cause inevitably, I kept inserting new pieces of info that belonged here and there. ******************* ~Anne Troy www.OfficeArticles.com www.MyExpertsOnline.com "Jeff" wrote in message ... Hi (using Word 2002 in XP). I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Thanks for any suggestions and ideas. -- Jeff Stevens Email address deliberately false to avoid spam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
See here, for one:
Creating a Table of Contents Spanning Multiple Documents http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/P...cle.asp?ID=148 IncludeText Fields might be an option, though this is a simplistic intro to them: http://daiya.mvps.org/includetext.htm Steve Hudson [Word Heretic] on how to make Master Documents work safely: http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ma...dhomepage.html More on why MDs are unreliable: Why Master Documents corrupt: http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/Genera...ocsCorrupt.htm How to recover a Master Document: http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/Genera...MasterDocs.htm You are not wrong to worry about putting all eggs in one basket, but the answer to that is backup frequently--turn on the Make BackUp option as Anne said, but also backup frequently yourself. I am not sure what difference frames may make to any of these options. Theoretically, none, I think. On 6/21/05 11:49 AM, "Jeff" wrote: Hi (using Word 2002 in XP). I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Thanks for any suggestions and ideas. -- Daiya Mitchell, MVP Mac/Word Word FAQ: http://www.word.mvps.org/ MacWord Tips: http://www.word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/ What's an MVP? A volunteer! Read the FAQ: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Jeff
Jeff wrote: I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? To add to what others have said already: A big question for me is whether the individual files you have right now are based on the same template, and whether the formatting used is consistent over these files. These things need sorting out if not only done so; and before that, even _thinking_ about a Master Document might corrupt your work! :-) Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? You could easily test the big file scenario: Bring all the chapters into one file via INCLUDETEXT fields. Save the file with active fields, then (in a copy), unlink all the fields. You have one big file now. Fiddle around with it a bit, how many pages are there? How big (filesize)? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Like Daiya, I don't see much problem with frames per se. The question I'd raise here is what you use them for: Are you running body text around your frames/illustrations? What kind of illustrations are we talking about, btw, and how were they inserted into Word (presuming they were not made in Word itself)? Greetinx Robert -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | MS \ / | MVP X Against HTML | for / \ in e-mail & news | Word |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for replying Anne.
1. Yes, Master/Subs in Word still sucks. 2. Don't worry about corruption of your one document. Instead, why don't you turn on creating a backup file under Tools--Options, Save tab? I have that, but my impression is that will avoid losing unsaved data, but not file corruption. 3. How big is your document? When I was writing my book, I used the document map feature to move around 'cause inevitably, I kept inserting new pieces of info that belonged here and there. Size will be about 400 book text pages, but with a lot of images in addition. I have to learn about the document map feature. Did not know about it. Thanks. -- Jeff Stevens Email address deliberately false to avoid spam "Anne Troy" wrote in message news:c8738$42b870c4$466eb880$18092@allthenewsgroup s.com... 1. Yes, Master/Subs in Word still sucks. 2. Don't worry about corruption of your one document. Instead, why don't you turn on creating a backup file under Tools--Options, Save tab? 3. How big is your document? When I was writing my book, I used the document map feature to move around 'cause inevitably, I kept inserting new pieces of info that belonged here and there. ******************* ~Anne Troy www.OfficeArticles.com www.MyExpertsOnline.com "Jeff" wrote in message ... Hi (using Word 2002 in XP). I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Thanks for any suggestions and ideas. -- Jeff Stevens Email address deliberately false to avoid spam |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Daiya.
Thanks for all the urls. I'll look them up. I already do frequent backups, so my concern is not about losing the entire file, but opening the file and finding the images corrupted, replaced by red Xs or something like that. That would be very hard to recover from. Thanks. -- Jeff Stevens Email address deliberately false to avoid spam "Daiya Mitchell" wrote in message .. . See here, for one: Creating a Table of Contents Spanning Multiple Documents http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/P...cle.asp?ID=148 IncludeText Fields might be an option, though this is a simplistic intro to them: http://daiya.mvps.org/includetext.htm Steve Hudson [Word Heretic] on how to make Master Documents work safely: http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ma...dhomepage.html More on why MDs are unreliable: Why Master Documents corrupt: http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/Genera...ocsCorrupt.htm How to recover a Master Document: http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/Genera...MasterDocs.htm You are not wrong to worry about putting all eggs in one basket, but the answer to that is backup frequently--turn on the Make BackUp option as Anne said, but also backup frequently yourself. I am not sure what difference frames may make to any of these options. Theoretically, none, I think. On 6/21/05 11:49 AM, "Jeff" wrote: Hi (using Word 2002 in XP). I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Thanks for any suggestions and ideas. -- Daiya Mitchell, MVP Mac/Word Word FAQ: http://www.word.mvps.org/ MacWord Tips: http://www.word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/ What's an MVP? A volunteer! Read the FAQ: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Make sure that your backups are separate and don't overwrite each other. A
file may corrupt before you realize that it is. -- Charles Kenyon Word New User FAQ & Web Directory: http://addbalance.com/word Intermediate User's Guide to Microsoft Word (supplemented version of Microsoft's Legal Users' Guide) http://addbalance.com/usersguide See also the MVP FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/word which is awesome! --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- This message is posted to a newsgroup. Please post replies and questions to the newsgroup so that others can learn from my ignorance and your wisdom. "Jeff" wrote in message ... Hi Daiya. Thanks for all the urls. I'll look them up. I already do frequent backups, so my concern is not about losing the entire file, but opening the file and finding the images corrupted, replaced by red Xs or something like that. That would be very hard to recover from. Thanks. -- Jeff Stevens Email address deliberately false to avoid spam "Daiya Mitchell" wrote in message .. . See here, for one: Creating a Table of Contents Spanning Multiple Documents http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/P...cle.asp?ID=148 IncludeText Fields might be an option, though this is a simplistic intro to them: http://daiya.mvps.org/includetext.htm Steve Hudson [Word Heretic] on how to make Master Documents work safely: http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ma...dhomepage.html More on why MDs are unreliable: Why Master Documents corrupt: http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/Genera...ocsCorrupt.htm How to recover a Master Document: http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/Genera...MasterDocs.htm You are not wrong to worry about putting all eggs in one basket, but the answer to that is backup frequently--turn on the Make BackUp option as Anne said, but also backup frequently yourself. I am not sure what difference frames may make to any of these options. Theoretically, none, I think. On 6/21/05 11:49 AM, "Jeff" wrote: Hi (using Word 2002 in XP). I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Thanks for any suggestions and ideas. -- Daiya Mitchell, MVP Mac/Word Word FAQ: http://www.word.mvps.org/ MacWord Tips: http://www.word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/ What's an MVP? A volunteer! Read the FAQ: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hi, Jeff. Some things you can do to AVOID corruption:
1. If you use drawing objects, please, please, please do it in PowerPoint and group them, then copy and paste as a picture into your Word doc. If you lose the image, it's in PPT. Also, corruption OFTEN occurs with documents that contain multiple drawn objects with multiple parts. 2. Make sure your pictures are compressed and resized BEFORE you insert them into Word. A good photo shouldn't need to be more than 100KB. You can use www.Irfanview.com as a free graphic compression software. 3. Do not crop or resize pictures in Word. When you crop, you're literally carrying a copy of the original size AND the cropped size! Double-dipping! 4. Get yourself a GMail account (I've got invites if you need one). Then, email a copy of the document to yourself when you're done working on it. Heck...I bet somebody could get you a macro that'll do it for you automatically when you close your document. 5. Never save it to a lesser version--not an important doc like this. It tends to bloat the doc. 6. Don't be afraid of a document that's 10MB, though even a 400+ Word 2003 document of ONLY text isn't quite 2MB. 7. Unless your "desktop publishing" it now, don't put the pictures in until you're done writing. ******************* ~Anne Troy www.OfficeArticles.com www.MyExpertsOnline.com "Jeff" wrote in message ... Hi Robert To add to what others have said already: A big question for me is whether the individual files you have right now are based on the same template, and whether the formatting used is consistent over these files. These things need sorting out if not only done so; and before that, even _thinking_ about a Master Document might corrupt your work! :-) Yes they all were and will be written using the same template and styles. You could easily test the big file scenario: Bring all the chapters into one file via INCLUDETEXT fields. Save the file with active fields, then (in a copy), unlink all the fields. You have one big file now. Fiddle around with it a bit, how many pages are there? How big (filesize)? There will be about 400 pages (book pages) plus a great many images. Never heard of INCLUDETEXT fields. I'll have to read up on it. Like Daiya, I don't see much problem with frames per se. The question I'd raise here is what you use them for: Are you running body text around your frames/illustrations? What kind of illustrations are we talking about, btw, and how were they inserted into Word (presuming they were not made in Word itself)? I only recently discovered frames which is why I asked the question since they add complexity, and yes I am running text around the frames and their captions. The illustrations are mostly photographs. I insert them into Word using Insert/picture/from file. Is that the best way to do it? Thanks. -- Jeff Stevens Email address deliberately false to avoid spam "Robert M. Franz (RMF)" wrote in message ... Hello Jeff Jeff wrote: I am writing a book that has many chapters. It is a complex book, so I'm writing a little in one chapter and a little in another at various times, adding ideas as they come along. At present each chapter is in a separate file, but that has created a great many separate files and I am looking for a way to coordinate them. I therefore thought of the Master document as a tool to do this. I used to use the Master document when I was writing in WordPerfect 5.1 and it worked very well for me. But I heard that master documents have problems and a great risk of corruption in Word. Is that true? What kind of problems occur with Master documents. Can they be avoided? To add to what others have said already: A big question for me is whether the individual files you have right now are based on the same template, and whether the formatting used is consistent over these files. These things need sorting out if not only done so; and before that, even _thinking_ about a Master Document might corrupt your work! :-) Any suggestions as to how to maintain a "big picture" of all the chapters in this manuscript? I could of course put them all in one huge file with the heading chapters creating a master list in the TOC - and I'm considering doing that - but the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket that might get corrupted somehow bothers me. Am I wrong to worry about that? You could easily test the big file scenario: Bring all the chapters into one file via INCLUDETEXT fields. Save the file with active fields, then (in a copy), unlink all the fields. You have one big file now. Fiddle around with it a bit, how many pages are there? How big (filesize)? This manuscript has a lot of illustrations (if that makes a difference in the responses) and I use frames to position them within the document. Like Daiya, I don't see much problem with frames per se. The question I'd raise here is what you use them for: Are you running body text around your frames/illustrations? What kind of illustrations are we talking about, btw, and how were they inserted into Word (presuming they were not made in Word itself)? Greetinx Robert -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | MS \ / | MVP X Against HTML | for / \ in e-mail & news | Word |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
It's my understanding that the Red X is often a display problem but doesn't
necessarily mean the images have been corrupted, but that's just some small experience, and on the Mac. Like Anne says, don't do any photo editing in Word, in which case you should have the original image files somewhere, no? Making corrupted images an exceedingly painful and tedious situation, but not irrecoverable. Re Doc Map, here's some more links: How it works: http://shaunakelly.com/word/documentmap/index.html A couple caveats that *should* be irrelevant to you, using Word 2002: http://daiya.mvps.org/docmap.htm Another good way to work with long documents, especially if you decide to rearrange text, is Outline View: http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/UsingOLView.htm (though rearranging across IncludeText fields could get ugly) On 6/21/05 7:15 PM, "Jeff" wrote: Hi Daiya. Thanks for all the urls. I'll look them up. I already do frequent backups, so my concern is not about losing the entire file, but opening the file and finding the images corrupted, replaced by red Xs or something like that. That would be very hard to recover from. Thanks. -- Daiya Mitchell, MVP Mac/Word Word FAQ: http://www.word.mvps.org/ MacWord Tips: http://www.word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/ What's an MVP? A volunteer! Read the FAQ: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How do I create & merge specific data base & master documents? | maggiev | New Users | 2 | January 12th, 2005 11:30 PM |
BUG? Master Documents with SharePoint Doc Libs | Jim Budde | General Discussion | 3 | January 10th, 2005 09:21 PM |
Can edits to master shapes trickle down to existing instances? | Mike | Visio | 1 | October 4th, 2004 05:28 PM |
Slide Master vs Title Master | Sarah B | Powerpoint | 6 | July 23rd, 2004 04:43 PM |
Master Documents | Scott | General Discussion | 5 | July 2nd, 2004 12:08 PM |