Calendar (Publisher 2003)

How does one make a change to a 12 month calendar's first page, for example
inserting or deleting objects, and then have that change reflected in all the
subsequent pages automatically? Or perhaps, each individual page needs to be
changed separately?

Thanks for your help!

Karen

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:32:02 +0000, Karen wrote
(in article ):

How does one make a change to a 12 month calendar's first page, for example
inserting or deleting objects, and then have that change reflected in all the

subsequent pages automatically? Or perhaps, each individual page needs to be

changed separately?

Thanks for your help!

Karen

You could have answered your own question with a modicum of research - this
question was asked - and answered - only yesterday. Please use Google Groups
before posting in future. You will need to use a dedicated calendar
application - or PagePlus.

Thank you Margolotta and I apologize for my error in posting this question if
it was recently answered to someone else. I'm a new user at this site and my
previous research didn't turn up any information, but perhaps I was searching
incorrectly. I will definitely use 'Google Groups' in the future.

In the meantime, thanks for your answer (and for your patience)!

Karen

"Margolotta" wrote:

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:32:02 +0000, Karen wrote
(in article ):

How does one make a change to a 12 month calendar's first page, for example
inserting or deleting objects, and then have that change reflected in all the

subsequent pages automatically? Or perhaps, each individual page needs to be

changed separately?

Thanks for your help!

Karen

You could have answered your own question with a modicum of research - this
question was asked - and answered - only yesterday. Please use Google Groups
before posting in future. You will need to use a dedicated calendar
application - or PagePlus.

Karen ask any question you like as often as you like here.

Ignore the fools and the British and you will get on well in life


"Karen" wrote in message
...
Thank you Margolotta and I apologize for my error in posting this question
if
it was recently answered to someone else. I'm a new user at this site and
my
previous research didn't turn up any information, but perhaps I was
searching
incorrectly. I will definitely use 'Google Groups' in the future.

In the meantime, thanks for your answer (and for your patience)!

Karen

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:15:02 +0000, Karen wrote
(in article ):

Thank you Margolotta and I apologize for my error in posting this question if

it was recently answered to someone else. I'm a new user at this site and my

previous research didn't turn up any information, but perhaps I was searching

incorrectly. I will definitely use 'Google Groups' in the future.

In the meantime, thanks for your answer (and for your patience)!

Karen


It's okay, but this isn't a site, it's Usenet; you just happen to be
accessing MS's groups via their website. Not only was it recently answered,
it's one of the most FAQs asked!

Ignorance isn't an excuse for not doing research - Google has been going for
nearly 8 years and the Groups archive goes back 25 years.

But, no harm done.

Blessed be

Margo

Margolotta was very recently
heard to utter:
It's okay, but this isn't a site, it's Usenet; you just happen to be
accessing MS's groups via their website.

It's not Usenet, it's just NNTP. And if the user is accessing the NNTP
interface at the website, and has not done so very much before, is new to
the site.

Karen, http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm is the best place to start reading
up on how to avoid getting attacked by flamers.

--
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher

:
: You could have answered your own question with a modicum of research -
this
: question was asked - and answered - only yesterday. Please use Google
Groups
: before posting in future. You will need to use a dedicated calendar
: application - or PagePlus.
:

Hang on a tick (NPI) - isn't it you that is requesting Google NOT to archive
your messages beyond six days? Think of all that priceless information being
lost for future generations.

My aren't we harsh towards other users, who may not be as infinitely
brilliant as you. Perhaps, a little more human undersanding and
tolerance might alienate less users . Should I have consulted Google
Groups on how to reply to rude responses, before I sent this? I'm sure
there must have been a recent post on the subject. I probably should
have just searched YOUR threads to find one.

Granny 3.1 was very recently heard
to utter:
since when does a acknowledged vampire say "blessed be"

And I suppose "Granny 3.1" is on your birth certificate?

by the way saw pictures of you and you should only
come out at night as you are fuuuuuuuggggggllllly.

Wow, how mature. Judging people on the way they look and taunting them for
it. Haven't seen that since I was in primary school.

--
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher

On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:37:26 +0000, Granny 3.1 wrote
(in article ):

since when does a acknowledged vampire

"Acknowledged vampire"?! Where have I *EVER* acknowledged I was a vampire?!
Vampires do not exist - stop watching Buffy/Angel/Charmed/whatever and enter
reality. Here's a news-flash for you - it isn't real! Sarah-Michelle Gellar
doesn't go round the world slaying the forces of evil.

'Margolotta' is a character in a novel by the prolific fantasy writer Terry
Pratchett. Novels are works of *FICTION*. Fiction is made-up, it isn't
*REAL*.

Just because I use that as my Usenet handle, doesn't mean I associate myself
with vampirism (I don't because, in a civilised world, killing someone to
drink their blood is a bad thing to do...). Let me spell it out to you -
*THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS VAMPIRES*

You need to go back to your shrink at tell them that you have problems
distinguishing reality from fantasy.



say "blessed be" grow up and act your
30+ years by the way saw pictures of you and you should only come out at
night as you are fuuuuuuuggggggllllly.


There are no photographs of me on the net (save on private servers for which
a password is required to access) so for you to have seen a photograph of me
is a tad difficult (therefore, I must conclude, you're a liar).