how to add pages with different orientations

I am making a publication in which I need some pages to be in a portrait
orientation and others in landscape. How can I do this?

Test time Sarah!

What six letter word has three y's?


--
Don
Vancouver USA


"Margolotta" wrote in message
. net...
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:07:47 +0000, Mike Koewler wrote
(in article ):

Sarah,

Did you ever consider that if you would be a tad less harsh on people,
you might not make as many enemies as you do? Why do you pretend to have
this "I'm a bitch who is going to ream you" attitude? You really don't
need to, you know.

Mike

If people want me to be "less harsh" then they should learn to wipe their
own
arses, instead of expecting others to wipe them for them. When I was
growing
up we were taught that we had to seek answers for ourselves, not expect
someone just to hand them to us on a plate.

It doesn't really bother me whether people like me or not. I'm not on this
planet to be liked. I was taught, by my maternal grandfather, not to
suffer
fools gladly and I don't. There is too much of this "fast food" culture.
When
I was at school we were sent to the library to do *research"; now, with
the
advent of Usenet, people think they can just expect answers handed to them
on
a silver platter. What makes them so special? What makes them so
privileged
that they demand answers without doing any work themselves? I'm sick and
tired and thoroughly fed up of this "gimme, gimme, gimme" attitude - it's
about damned time we got back to the days when people learnt things for
themselves. If my "harsh" replies stop idiots from asking the same idiotic
questions ad nauseam et ad infinitum then I will consider my job done and
my
mission accomplished.

It's simple really: - If people don't want an ear-bashing, then they
research
first. Otherwise, they've only got themselves to blame.

This was the philosophy I was taught at school and it's a damned good one.

There is even less of an excuse with the advent of Google.

And if your referring to 'Granny' and its ilk, well they couldn't find
their
own arses with a map, compass and their hands tied behind their back.
There
is more chance of me winning the Euromillions lottery than there is of any
of
them tracking me down.

No one is forcing anyone to like me - I'm certainly not.

Don Schmidt Don Retired was very recently heard to
utter:
What six letter word has three y's?

Found in under 30 seconds on Google.

:-D

--
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher

Margolotta wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:07:47 +0000, Mike Koewler wrote
(in article ):


Sarah,

Did you ever consider that if you would be a tad less harsh on people,
you might not make as many enemies as you do? Why do you pretend to have
this "I'm a bitch who is going to ream you" attitude? You really don't
need to, you know.

Mike


If people want me to be "less harsh" then they should learn to wipe their own
arses, instead of expecting others to wipe them for them. When I was growing
up we were taught that we had to seek answers for ourselves, not expect
someone just to hand them to us on a plate.

It doesn't really bother me whether people like me or not. I'm not on this
planet to be liked. I was taught, by my maternal grandfather, not to suffer
fools gladly and I don't. There is too much of this "fast food" culture. When
I was at school we were sent to the library to do *research"; now, with the
advent of Usenet, people think they can just expect answers handed to them on
a silver platter. What makes them so special? What makes them so privileged
that they demand answers without doing any work themselves? I'm sick and
tired and thoroughly fed up of this "gimme, gimme, gimme" attitude - it's
about damned time we got back to the days when people learnt things for
themselves. If my "harsh" replies stop idiots from asking the same idiotic
questions ad nauseam et ad infinitum then I will consider my job done and my
mission accomplished.

It's simple really: - If people don't want an ear-bashing, then they research
first. Otherwise, they've only got themselves to blame.

This was the philosophy I was taught at school and it's a damned good one.

There is even less of an excuse with the advent of Google.

And if your referring to 'Granny' and its ilk, well they couldn't find their
own arses with a map, compass and their hands tied behind their back. There
is more chance of me winning the Euromillions lottery than there is of any of
them tracking me down.

No one is forcing anyone to like me - I'm certainly not.

You need help! I mean real, honest to goodness mental help. You won't
find it at the library or on google. You need to immediately go to your
nearest health care provider and say to them 'please help me, as I am
one miserable humane being".
Otherwise, you are hereby forbidden to ever post here again!
Frank

Cheater! Cheater!


--
Don
"May your shadow be found in happy places." (Native North American)


"Ed Bennett" wrote in message
...
Don Schmidt Don Retired was very recently heard to
utter:
What six letter word has three y's?

Found in under 30 seconds on Google.

:-D

--
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher

"Margolotta" wrote in message
. net...
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:07:47 +0000, Mike Koewler wrote
(in article ):

Sarah,

Did you ever consider that if you would be a tad less harsh on people,
you might not make as many enemies as you do? Why do you pretend to have
this "I'm a bitch who is going to ream you" attitude? You really don't
need to, you know.

Mike

If people want me to be "less harsh" then they should learn to wipe their
own
arses, instead of expecting others to wipe them for them. When I was
growing
up we were taught that we had to seek answers for ourselves, not expect
someone just to hand them to us on a plate.

It doesn't really bother me whether people like me or not. I'm not on this
planet to be liked. I was taught, by my maternal grandfather, not to
suffer
fools gladly and I don't. There is too much of this "fast food" culture.
When
I was at school we were sent to the library to do *research"; now, with
the
advent of Usenet, people think they can just expect answers handed to them
on
a silver platter. What makes them so special? What makes them so
privileged
that they demand answers without doing any work themselves? I'm sick and
tired and thoroughly fed up of this "gimme, gimme, gimme" attitude - it's
about damned time we got back to the days when people learnt things for
themselves. If my "harsh" replies stop idiots from asking the same idiotic
questions ad nauseam et ad infinitum then I will consider my job done and
my
mission accomplished.

It's simple really: - If people don't want an ear-bashing, then they
research
first. Otherwise, they've only got themselves to blame.

This was the philosophy I was taught at school and it's a damned good one.

There is even less of an excuse with the advent of Google.

And if your referring to 'Granny' and its ilk, well they couldn't find
their
own arses with a map, compass and their hands tied behind their back.
There
is more chance of me winning the Euromillions lottery than there is of any
of
them tracking me down.

No one is forcing anyone to like me - I'm certainly not.

Margolotta,

Maybe you should take some schooling of your own so that you would be able
to distinguish between "learnt" and "learned." As in: "...when people learnt
things..."

Chuck Davis newsgroup at anthemwebs dot com was very recently heard
to utter:
Maybe you should take some schooling of your own so that you would be
able to distinguish between "learnt" and "learned." As in: "...when
people learnt things..."

Over here, we speak UK English, where "learnt" is a perfectly valid
alternative to "learned" (in this context).

See the Cambridge English Dictionary:
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/defi...5245&dict=CALD

--
Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher

Ed Bennett wrote:
Chuck Davis newsgroup at anthemwebs dot com was very recently heard
to utter:

Maybe you should take some schooling of your own so that you would be
able to distinguish between "learnt" and "learned." As in: "...when
people learnt things..."


Over here, we speak UK English, where "learnt" is a perfectly valid
alternative to "learned" (in this context).

See the Cambridge English Dictionary:
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/defi...5245&dict=CALD

What is it with this ng anyway? First we put up with David A's crap for
years now we have Sarah B, who can't get along with herself, let along
any other humane being. I mean, is it something in Pub software that
causes this sort of anti-social behavior?
Maybe a bug? If so, hopefully it'll be gone in Office 12!
:-)
Frank

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:07:58 +0000, Chuck Davis wrote
(in article ):


"Margolotta" wrote in message
. net...
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:07:47 +0000, Mike Koewler wrote
(in article ):

Sarah,

Did you ever consider that if you would be a tad less harsh on people,
you might not make as many enemies as you do? Why do you pretend to have
this "I'm a bitch who is going to ream you" attitude? You really don't
need to, you know.

Mike

If people want me to be "less harsh" then they should learn to wipe their
own
arses, instead of expecting others to wipe them for them. When I was
growing
up we were taught that we had to seek answers for ourselves, not expect
someone just to hand them to us on a plate.

It doesn't really bother me whether people like me or not. I'm not on this
planet to be liked. I was taught, by my maternal grandfather, not to
suffer
fools gladly and I don't. There is too much of this "fast food" culture.
When
I was at school we were sent to the library to do *research"; now, with
the
advent of Usenet, people think they can just expect answers handed to them
on
a silver platter. What makes them so special? What makes them so
privileged
that they demand answers without doing any work themselves? I'm sick and
tired and thoroughly fed up of this "gimme, gimme, gimme" attitude - it's
about damned time we got back to the days when people learnt things for
themselves. If my "harsh" replies stop idiots from asking the same idiotic
questions ad nauseam et ad infinitum then I will consider my job done and
my
mission accomplished.

It's simple really: - If people don't want an ear-bashing, then they
research
first. Otherwise, they've only got themselves to blame.

This was the philosophy I was taught at school and it's a damned good one.

There is even less of an excuse with the advent of Google.

And if your referring to 'Granny' and its ilk, well they couldn't find
their
own arses with a map, compass and their hands tied behind their back.
There
is more chance of me winning the Euromillions lottery than there is of any
of
them tracking me down.

No one is forcing anyone to like me - I'm certainly not.

Margolotta,

Maybe you should take some schooling of your own so that you would be able
to distinguish between "learnt" and "learned." As in: "...when people learnt
things..."

There *IS* no difference, dickwad. They are both valid past participles of
the verb 'to learn'

Maybe you can tell me what the distinction is. Maybe you can tell Chambers,
the OED and Cambridge what the distinction is.

FYI, America is NOT the only country on this planet. I suggest you learn
this. You should have LEARNT it in school, but I guess you were too busy
learning other things...

From the OED's FAQ

What is the difference between 'learnt' and 'learned'?
These are alternative forms of the past tense and past participle of the verb
learn. Learnt is more common in British English, and learned in American
English. There are a number of verbs of this type (burn, dream, kneel, lean,
leap, spell, spill, spoil etc.). They are all irregular verbs, and this is a
part of their irregularity.

So tell me, dear Charlie, why in Hades I should want to associate myself with
the US?

Let me guess you're Republican, aren't you...? Most Republicans are surprised
to learn there are other countries in the world...

We Yanks just improved on the language a bit. Smoothed the rough edges, put
in a curve or two and polished it up a bit.

Yep, un huh, dat's right.

AND! Perfected the skill of top posting!

--
Don
Vancouver USA

P.S. If you're limping, your leg has been pulled.


"Margolotta" wrote in message
. net...
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:07:58 +0000, Chuck Davis wrote
(in article ):


"Margolotta" wrote in message
. net...
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:07:47 +0000, Mike Koewler wrote
(in article ):

Sarah,

Did you ever consider that if you would be a tad less harsh on people,
you might not make as many enemies as you do? Why do you pretend to
have
this "I'm a bitch who is going to ream you" attitude? You really don't
need to, you know.

Mike

If people want me to be "less harsh" then they should learn to wipe
their
own
arses, instead of expecting others to wipe them for them. When I was
growing
up we were taught that we had to seek answers for ourselves, not expect
someone just to hand them to us on a plate.

It doesn't really bother me whether people like me or not. I'm not on
this
planet to be liked. I was taught, by my maternal grandfather, not to
suffer
fools gladly and I don't. There is too much of this "fast food" culture.
When
I was at school we were sent to the library to do *research"; now, with
the
advent of Usenet, people think they can just expect answers handed to
them
on
a silver platter. What makes them so special? What makes them so
privileged
that they demand answers without doing any work themselves? I'm sick and
tired and thoroughly fed up of this "gimme, gimme, gimme" attitude -
it's
about damned time we got back to the days when people learnt things for
themselves. If my "harsh" replies stop idiots from asking the same
idiotic
questions ad nauseam et ad infinitum then I will consider my job done
and
my
mission accomplished.

It's simple really: - If people don't want an ear-bashing, then they
research
first. Otherwise, they've only got themselves to blame.

This was the philosophy I was taught at school and it's a damned good
one.

There is even less of an excuse with the advent of Google.

And if your referring to 'Granny' and its ilk, well they couldn't find
their
own arses with a map, compass and their hands tied behind their back.
There
is more chance of me winning the Euromillions lottery than there is of
any
of
them tracking me down.

No one is forcing anyone to like me - I'm certainly not.

Margolotta,

Maybe you should take some schooling of your own so that you would be
able
to distinguish between "learnt" and "learned." As in: "...when people
learnt
things..."

There *IS* no difference, dickwad. They are both valid past participles of
the verb 'to learn'

Maybe you can tell me what the distinction is. Maybe you can tell
Chambers,
the OED and Cambridge what the distinction is.

FYI, America is NOT the only country on this planet. I suggest you learn
this. You should have LEARNT it in school, but I guess you were too busy
learning other things...

From the OED's FAQ

What is the difference between 'learnt' and 'learned'?
These are alternative forms of the past tense and past participle of the
verb
learn. Learnt is more common in British English, and learned in American
English. There are a number of verbs of this type (burn, dream, kneel,
lean,
leap, spell, spill, spoil etc.). They are all irregular verbs, and this is
a
part of their irregularity.

So tell me, dear Charlie, why in Hades I should want to associate myself
with
the US?

Let me guess you're Republican, aren't you...? Most Republicans are
surprised
to learn there are other countries in the world...