If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
You may be better off using a hammer rather than a spanner.
I would suggest that you read up on normalisation and then apply that to your data. You may wish to check the Access 2002 Knowledge Base article 283878 dated 10 October 2003. (Referenced on MSDN Library DVD July 2004) or online at http://support.microsoft.com/?id=283878 -- Slainte Craig Alexander Morrison "CVL" wrote in message ... Ok. So your saying the blank entries is the problem. Why then when I create a new database and have 2 fields only plus a primary key, multiple index the 2 fields and enter in details for both the fields on every record does it still record say: "Test, Test" and "Test, Test". Is there prehaps an option in Access or an extra item I require to install to run this properly? Is there another way of ensuring the same value does not get entered into the 10 fields throughout the database? eg "Test" cannot be placed on another field on the record OR on another field in ANY record. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
John you seem to understand exactly what I am trying to accomplish. However
the problem is that I am selecting the indexes icon, I am selecting one name and then the fields and I have set the index to unique yet it ignores the index completely as if it was not there. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I will look further into possibly making another table and for the fields.
As for a design flaw with the data only being entered once it is because of the data that is being delt with. The 10 fields are dealing with vehicle registration numbers, because we can not work on a single vehicle more than once these entries will not need to be used again. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
It is particularly tempting to use a hammer against this problem I must admit.
I know normalisation is to remove many to many relationships, however these fields dont include a relationship at the moment because it was not needed. However if I try to go around the problem and create another table this will become neccessary. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 03:17:06 -0700, CVL
wrote: John you seem to understand exactly what I am trying to accomplish. However the problem is that I am selecting the indexes icon, I am selecting one name and then the fields and I have set the index to unique yet it ignores the index completely as if it was not there. On rereading the thread, it seems I did misunderstand. Do you mean that if the value A123321 occurs in ANY of the ten fields, in ANY record, then it should be prohibited in any field in any other record? If so, a) an Index will not help and b) as suggested by the other volunteers here, your table structure is INCORRECT and should be revised. John W. Vinson[MVP] (no longer chatting for now) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
=?Utf-8?B?Q1ZM?= wrote in
: I will look further into possibly making another table and for the fields. If you are able to tell us a bit more about what you are trying to achieve, we may be able to help. I see that the other half of this thread is coming to the same conclusion! B Wishes Tim F |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Merging with Access queries - Multiple | CPutnam | Mailmerge | 5 | August 21st, 2004 01:11 PM |
Multiple Many-To-Many Tables | Tom | Database Design | 7 | May 15th, 2004 03:47 AM |
Opening multiple workbooks in multiple windows | Dave Peterson | Worksheet Functions | 0 | February 22nd, 2004 04:20 PM |
Multiple Conditions and Multiple Solutions | Frank Kabel | Worksheet Functions | 0 | February 4th, 2004 09:22 PM |