If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
I wrote:
"Jef Gorbach" wrote: So will google groups still access this forum once it relocates?? That is not really possible, well at least not without significant investment by Google. I should clarify that I interpreted Jef's question to be: will Google Groups continue to track contributions made to the new forum? Two related questions a (a) whether GG (or Giganews) will continue to permit posting to its own set of microsoft.public newsgroups, creating an independent forum in effect; and (b) even if not, whether GG will keep its huge archive of old postings to microsoft.public newsgroups for searching and reading, and for how long? I suspect the answers are "no" and "probably not". With respect to #a, the newsgroup system (Usenet) is composed of an unstructured set of computers that lack any central administration or authority. So theoretically, GG could continue to maintain an active set of microsoft.public newsgroups, allowing users to access them exclusively through the GG web interface. Giganews could do essentially the same thing, and GG would never know the difference. (I don't know if Giganews has a user interface of its own.) However, note that Microsoft is a trademarked name; and the content of the microsoft.public NGs originate on Microsoft servers. So I expect that Microsoft will require that all well-known mirrors of the microsoft.public NGs stop providing active acccess -- that is, accepting postings. With respect to #b, the same legal issue applies to merely retaining an archive of old microsoft.public NGs. Even though the archives themselves are the property of their owners (e.g. GG), the NG names still contain a trademarked name. Whether or not Microsoft will stand on that principle, or GG renames those NGs in its archive, remains to be seen. But in any case, I doubt that GG would permit read and search access on those NGs, but not write access (posting). Of course, I don't know. We might have to just wait and see. ----- original message ----- "Joe User" joeu2004 wrote in message ... "Jef Gorbach" wrote: So will google groups still access this forum once it relocates?? That is not really possible, well at least not without significant investment by Google. Google relies on a particular network protocol (NNTP) to access the Microsoft forums archived on the MSnews server. Actually, Google relies on Giganews, which in turn relies on the MSnews server. Hypothetically, Microsoft might still mirror new forum activity on their MSnews server. That is how the current "Discussion Groups" forum works. But my understanding of their explanation is that they will not. They write: "Microsoft has a long history of establishing newsgroups that channel users and issues into the newsgroup (NNTP) space where information is shared and problems can be addressed by the community. [....] Using forums as the online support strategy will reduce the number of redundant resources and centralize content, making community contributions more broadly available and impactful. Beginning in June 2010, Microsoft will begin closing newsgroups and migrating users to Microsoft forums". It seems clear that they are contrasting "newsgroup" access with "forum" access, and they will be limiting access to the "forum" only through their interface. Theoretically, Google could design a program that "reads" the Microsoft web interface, sorts things out, and archives inquires and responses in the form that Google is accustomed to. After all, parsing HTML is Google's core business. However, I doubt that would happen. It would require that Google treat the Microsoft "newsgroups" differently from the many thousands of other newsgroups that Google archives. Moreover, Google Groups is not the only other way to access Microsoft newsgroups today. Even if GG implements a solution, users of the other alternatives will be affected adversely. To put all this in a positive light, I suspect that Microsoft's purpose is to shield its forums from spam. That would be a good thing, if Microsoft weren't so inept at supporting reliable forums. Of course, maybe Microsoft will change. ;-) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else.
What? Who's casting aspersions? Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. You seem to fly off the handle quite easily and often for reasons that I don't understand. So, to eliminate any further misunderstanding of any comments I may make I will no longer interact with you. I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Good grief! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
"T. Valko" wrote:
I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Talk about overreaction! Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? You wrote: "I have no idea if that link mentions the location". You wrote that in response to my comment which quotes exactly what that link mentions. So how can you have "no idea"? Ergo, your comment seems to dismiss or question the correction of my statement. I did suspect that you meant to write: "I have not looked at the link myself". But who am I to put words into your mouth? And even so, there is no reason for you not to take my word for it, since I provided a direct quote. (If I had not directly quoted from the link, it would have been reasonable for you not to take my word for it.) All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. And if you had expressed yourself exactly that way, I would have had no issue with it. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. What? Who's casting aspersions? Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. You seem to fly off the handle quite easily and often for reasons that I don't understand. So, to eliminate any further misunderstanding of any comments I may make I will no longer interact with you. I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Good grief! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
In article , "T. Valko" wrote:
I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! This is a backward step IMO. To me, newsgroups have everything that is good with nothing (well, OK, very little ) that is bad about the on line community. A short list of these would include: Quick and easy. Simple disply. Can get headers only and download just what you want to read. Properly threaded discussions. Access to hundreds/thousands of helpful knowlegeable people not only willing but eager to help. Text only (ie *not* web based). Many news readers available ... there's is bound to be something out there to suit everyone. Archived. Negatives ? Well, a few spammers and idiots ... but most news software has excellent filters, so that's taken care of. For myself, I will never use a browser to read news or "forums". It's too slow, too clunky and cumbersome, has bad to non existent threading, bad to no filters and is ugly, to name a few reasons. I guess there will be a few die hards puts up hand that stick with MS news groups, for a while at least, and it is likely there will still be some traffic for a while with a few people willing and able to help ... but it sounds like MS is trying to kill off this helpful support line. Given it's free to them, I can't imagine why they think this is a good idea. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
I pretty much agree with everything you said.
The best feature of NNTP ngs from my perspective is that it's very easy to watch a thread for possible follow-ups. I also like the speed and ease of access. -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Bruce Sinclair" wrote in message ... In article , "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! This is a backward step IMO. To me, newsgroups have everything that is good with nothing (well, OK, very little ) that is bad about the on line community. A short list of these would include: Quick and easy. Simple disply. Can get headers only and download just what you want to read. Properly threaded discussions. Access to hundreds/thousands of helpful knowlegeable people not only willing but eager to help. Text only (ie *not* web based). Many news readers available ... there's is bound to be something out there to suit everyone. Archived. Negatives ? Well, a few spammers and idiots ... but most news software has excellent filters, so that's taken care of. For myself, I will never use a browser to read news or "forums". It's too slow, too clunky and cumbersome, has bad to non existent threading, bad to no filters and is ugly, to name a few reasons. I guess there will be a few die hards puts up hand that stick with MS news groups, for a while at least, and it is likely there will still be some traffic for a while with a few people willing and able to help ... but it sounds like MS is trying to kill off this helpful support line. Given it's free to them, I can't imagine why they think this is a good idea. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
I agree with you and Bruce. However... the new Answers site could be a winner if it used the Ribbon. g -- Jim Cone Portland, Oregon USA "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I pretty much agree with everything you said. The best feature of NNTP ngs from my perspective is that it's very easy to watch a thread for possible follow-ups. I also like the speed and ease of access. -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
What Biff said was, here's another link to the forums. I didn't sense
any negative tone to his post. I don't know why he reacted so strongly, but I don't know the history of your interactions. - Jon ------- Jon Peltier Peltier Technical Services, Inc. http://peltiertech.com/ On 5/5/2010 7:15 PM, Joe User wrote: "T. Valko" wrote: I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Talk about overreaction! Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? You wrote: "I have no idea if that link mentions the location". You wrote that in response to my comment which quotes exactly what that link mentions. So how can you have "no idea"? Ergo, your comment seems to dismiss or question the correction of my statement. I did suspect that you meant to write: "I have not looked at the link myself". But who am I to put words into your mouth? And even so, there is no reason for you not to take my word for it, since I provided a direct quote. (If I had not directly quoted from the link, it would have been reasonable for you not to take my word for it.) All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. And if you had expressed yourself exactly that way, I would have had no issue with it. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. What? Who's casting aspersions? Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. You seem to fly off the handle quite easily and often for reasons that I don't understand. So, to eliminate any further misunderstanding of any comments I may make I will no longer interact with you. I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Good grief! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
There are two problems with NNTP, from Microsoft's viewpoint:
1. It's old and unshiny. 2. It was not invented in Redmond. - Jon ------- Jon Peltier Peltier Technical Services, Inc. http://peltiertech.com/ On 5/5/2010 7:26 PM, Bruce Sinclair wrote: In , "T. wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! This is a backward step IMO. To me, newsgroups have everything that is good with nothing (well, OK, very little ) that is bad about the on line community. A short list of these would include: Quick and easy. Simple disply. Can get headers only and download just what you want to read. Properly threaded discussions. Access to hundreds/thousands of helpful knowlegeable people not only willing but eager to help. Text only (ie *not* web based). Many news readers available ... there's is bound to be something out there to suit everyone. Archived. Negatives ? Well, a few spammers and idiots ... but most news software has excellent filters, so that's taken care of. For myself, I will never use a browser to read news or "forums". It's too slow, too clunky and cumbersome, has bad to non existent threading, bad to no filters and is ugly, to name a few reasons. I guess there will be a few die hardsputs up hand that stick with MS news groups, for a while at least, and it is likely there will still be some traffic for a while with a few people willing and able to help ... but it sounds like MS is trying to kill off this helpful support line. Given it's free to them, I can't imagine why they think this is a good idea. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
"Jon Peltier" wrote in message ... There are two problems with NNTP, from Microsoft's viewpoint: 1. It's old and unshiny. 2. It was not invented in Redmond. 3. They are not able to control it - now they decide what is THE right answer 4. It doesn't have the highly desirable points (now what can they possibly be for) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Online Communities
"Jim Cone" wrote in message ... I agree with you and Bruce. However... the new Answers site could be a winner if it used the Ribbon. g By gosh, I think he's got it! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|