If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Mapping Fields aren't saved
Hi guys. Looks like Karl is the emmient specialist on this subjet matter, so
here goes! I am trying to import an Excel.cvs file with contacts into Outlook 2002. When I get to the custom fields map wizard, the fields where I click on "+" to expand (Name, for instance) don't take the field I map from when I click OK to save. There is no problem with the fields that don't expand, the map is saved. The .cvs file to be mapped has fields in French and Outlook is in English, but since the unexpandable fields don't pose a problem, that can't be the issue. I can't figure it out... -- Cheers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The problem you're describing goes as follows:
#1 - Map any field from your source to any of the individual sub name fields (i.e. First Name etc) #2 - Click OK and then immediately open up the "Map To Custom Fields" screen again before clicking on Finish. #3 - The fields you've mapped in step #1 get replaced with Outlook's own field name. This only occurs if you've mapped a field to it otherwise the mapping of the field stays blank when you open up this page a second time. This has nothing to do with the language and is also not just an Outlook '2002 issue - does the same thing in O'2003. Having said all of that - if you ignore the fact that Outlook shows the target field name instead of your source field name on subsequent visits to the mapping page - the field you mapped in step #1 will end up where you want it to go. This is equally true if you close Outlook, restart it, and perform the import again with no changes to the last mapping set. Even though the name that displays on the list is incorrect, the field you originally mapped will be used for the import. One caveat that you should be aware of in terms of the name sub fields. These are used to construct the full name field so don't map to the full name AND individual parts of it. Map to one or the other (i.e. Name versus FirstName - Last Name) but not both. Same thing applies to the street address fields (Business, Home, Other). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Hi guys. Looks like Karl is the emmient specialist on this subjet matter, so here goes! I am trying to import an Excel.cvs file with contacts into Outlook 2002. When I get to the custom fields map wizard, the fields where I click on "+" to expand (Name, for instance) don't take the field I map from when I click OK to save. There is no problem with the fields that don't expand, the map is saved. The .cvs file to be mapped has fields in French and Outlook is in English, but since the unexpandable fields don't pose a problem, that can't be the issue. I can't figure it out... -- Cheers. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for your input Karl!
The thing is freaky, Lord knows why they don't fix, with all the money the company sucks in! I will try what you say (I removed the TO fields and they dissapear, unless I try and darg the source fields in, in which case they go back to the default fields. CHeers. EB "Karl Timmermans" wrote: The problem you're describing goes as follows: #1 - Map any field from your source to any of the individual sub name fields (i.e. First Name etc) #2 - Click OK and then immediately open up the "Map To Custom Fields" screen again before clicking on Finish. #3 - The fields you've mapped in step #1 get replaced with Outlook's own field name. This only occurs if you've mapped a field to it otherwise the mapping of the field stays blank when you open up this page a second time. This has nothing to do with the language and is also not just an Outlook '2002 issue - does the same thing in O'2003. Having said all of that - if you ignore the fact that Outlook shows the target field name instead of your source field name on subsequent visits to the mapping page - the field you mapped in step #1 will end up where you want it to go. This is equally true if you close Outlook, restart it, and perform the import again with no changes to the last mapping set. Even though the name that displays on the list is incorrect, the field you originally mapped will be used for the import. One caveat that you should be aware of in terms of the name sub fields. These are used to construct the full name field so don't map to the full name AND individual parts of it. Map to one or the other (i.e. Name versus FirstName - Last Name) but not both. Same thing applies to the street address fields (Business, Home, Other). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Hi guys. Looks like Karl is the emmient specialist on this subjet matter, so here goes! I am trying to import an Excel.cvs file with contacts into Outlook 2002. When I get to the custom fields map wizard, the fields where I click on "+" to expand (Name, for instance) don't take the field I map from when I click OK to save. There is no problem with the fields that don't expand, the map is saved. The .cvs file to be mapped has fields in French and Outlook is in English, but since the unexpandable fields don't pose a problem, that can't be the issue. I can't figure it out... -- Cheers. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Just to make sure we're on the same page, the original response I posted is
based on your Excel file having a "header row" (each column in the first row represents the field name for the columns in all the rows that follow it). Little confused about what you mean by "dragging your source field" which could mean either dragging the appropriate field name or if you don't have a header row - you would then be dragging actual data (not recommended). If the latter is the case then add a header row to your Excel file first and go thru the process again taking into account everything I described in the initial response. Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Thanks for your input Karl! The thing is freaky, Lord knows why they don't fix, with all the money the company sucks in! I will try what you say (I removed the TO fields and they dissapear, unless I try and darg the source fields in, in which case they go back to the default fields. CHeers. EB "Karl Timmermans" wrote: The problem you're describing goes as follows: #1 - Map any field from your source to any of the individual sub name fields (i.e. First Name etc) #2 - Click OK and then immediately open up the "Map To Custom Fields" screen again before clicking on Finish. #3 - The fields you've mapped in step #1 get replaced with Outlook's own field name. This only occurs if you've mapped a field to it otherwise the mapping of the field stays blank when you open up this page a second time. This has nothing to do with the language and is also not just an Outlook '2002 issue - does the same thing in O'2003. Having said all of that - if you ignore the fact that Outlook shows the target field name instead of your source field name on subsequent visits to the mapping page - the field you mapped in step #1 will end up where you want it to go. This is equally true if you close Outlook, restart it, and perform the import again with no changes to the last mapping set. Even though the name that displays on the list is incorrect, the field you originally mapped will be used for the import. One caveat that you should be aware of in terms of the name sub fields. These are used to construct the full name field so don't map to the full name AND individual parts of it. Map to one or the other (i.e. Name versus FirstName - Last Name) but not both. Same thing applies to the street address fields (Business, Home, Other). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Hi guys. Looks like Karl is the emmient specialist on this subjet matter, so here goes! I am trying to import an Excel.cvs file with contacts into Outlook 2002. When I get to the custom fields map wizard, the fields where I click on "+" to expand (Name, for instance) don't take the field I map from when I click OK to save. There is no problem with the fields that don't expand, the map is saved. The .cvs file to be mapped has fields in French and Outlook is in English, but since the unexpandable fields don't pose a problem, that can't be the issue. I can't figure it out... -- Cheers. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
No Kral, we are speaking the same language. I was indeed referring to
dragging the "source" header row fields to the righthand window. If for instance, I remove "Title" from the expanded Name, and replace it with the srouce "Titre" from my header row, it disappears when I click OK. Just as you pointed out... Cheers. "Karl Timmermans" wrote: Just to make sure we're on the same page, the original response I posted is based on your Excel file having a "header row" (each column in the first row represents the field name for the columns in all the rows that follow it). Little confused about what you mean by "dragging your source field" which could mean either dragging the appropriate field name or if you don't have a header row - you would then be dragging actual data (not recommended). If the latter is the case then add a header row to your Excel file first and go thru the process again taking into account everything I described in the initial response. Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Thanks for your input Karl! The thing is freaky, Lord knows why they don't fix, with all the money the company sucks in! I will try what you say (I removed the TO fields and they dissapear, unless I try and darg the source fields in, in which case they go back to the default fields. CHeers. EB "Karl Timmermans" wrote: The problem you're describing goes as follows: #1 - Map any field from your source to any of the individual sub name fields (i.e. First Name etc) #2 - Click OK and then immediately open up the "Map To Custom Fields" screen again before clicking on Finish. #3 - The fields you've mapped in step #1 get replaced with Outlook's own field name. This only occurs if you've mapped a field to it otherwise the mapping of the field stays blank when you open up this page a second time. This has nothing to do with the language and is also not just an Outlook '2002 issue - does the same thing in O'2003. Having said all of that - if you ignore the fact that Outlook shows the target field name instead of your source field name on subsequent visits to the mapping page - the field you mapped in step #1 will end up where you want it to go. This is equally true if you close Outlook, restart it, and perform the import again with no changes to the last mapping set. Even though the name that displays on the list is incorrect, the field you originally mapped will be used for the import. One caveat that you should be aware of in terms of the name sub fields. These are used to construct the full name field so don't map to the full name AND individual parts of it. Map to one or the other (i.e. Name versus FirstName - Last Name) but not both. Same thing applies to the street address fields (Business, Home, Other). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Hi guys. Looks like Karl is the emmient specialist on this subjet matter, so here goes! I am trying to import an Excel.cvs file with contacts into Outlook 2002. When I get to the custom fields map wizard, the fields where I click on "+" to expand (Name, for instance) don't take the field I map from when I click OK to save. There is no problem with the fields that don't expand, the map is saved. The .cvs file to be mapped has fields in French and Outlook is in English, but since the unexpandable fields don't pose a problem, that can't be the issue. I can't figure it out... -- Cheers. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Just curious if you're still reading this thread- have you been able to
import your info once the "idiosyncracies" were dealt with? Would really like to know (preferably by emailing me directly). I don't email anyone as a matter of practice from this forum for any reason unless personally contacted first (all kinds of business reasons for that including potential SPAM complaints - those of you that have contacted me know that you'll get responded to honestly one way or the other and if our product doesn't fit, we'll be the first to tell you - not interested in unhappy customers). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... No Kral, we are speaking the same language. I was indeed referring to dragging the "source" header row fields to the righthand window. If for instance, I remove "Title" from the expanded Name, and replace it with the srouce "Titre" from my header row, it disappears when I click OK. Just as you pointed out... Cheers. "Karl Timmermans" wrote: Just to make sure we're on the same page, the original response I posted is based on your Excel file having a "header row" (each column in the first row represents the field name for the columns in all the rows that follow it). Little confused about what you mean by "dragging your source field" which could mean either dragging the appropriate field name or if you don't have a header row - you would then be dragging actual data (not recommended). If the latter is the case then add a header row to your Excel file first and go thru the process again taking into account everything I described in the initial response. Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Thanks for your input Karl! The thing is freaky, Lord knows why they don't fix, with all the money the company sucks in! I will try what you say (I removed the TO fields and they dissapear, unless I try and darg the source fields in, in which case they go back to the default fields. CHeers. EB "Karl Timmermans" wrote: The problem you're describing goes as follows: #1 - Map any field from your source to any of the individual sub name fields (i.e. First Name etc) #2 - Click OK and then immediately open up the "Map To Custom Fields" screen again before clicking on Finish. #3 - The fields you've mapped in step #1 get replaced with Outlook's own field name. This only occurs if you've mapped a field to it otherwise the mapping of the field stays blank when you open up this page a second time. This has nothing to do with the language and is also not just an Outlook '2002 issue - does the same thing in O'2003. Having said all of that - if you ignore the fact that Outlook shows the target field name instead of your source field name on subsequent visits to the mapping page - the field you mapped in step #1 will end up where you want it to go. This is equally true if you close Outlook, restart it, and perform the import again with no changes to the last mapping set. Even though the name that displays on the list is incorrect, the field you originally mapped will be used for the import. One caveat that you should be aware of in terms of the name sub fields. These are used to construct the full name field so don't map to the full name AND individual parts of it. Map to one or the other (i.e. Name versus FirstName - Last Name) but not both. Same thing applies to the street address fields (Business, Home, Other). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Hi guys. Looks like Karl is the emmient specialist on this subjet matter, so here goes! I am trying to import an Excel.cvs file with contacts into Outlook 2002. When I get to the custom fields map wizard, the fields where I click on "+" to expand (Name, for instance) don't take the field I map from when I click OK to save. There is no problem with the fields that don't expand, the map is saved. The .cvs file to be mapped has fields in French and Outlook is in English, but since the unexpandable fields don't pose a problem, that can't be the issue. I can't figure it out... -- Cheers. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Karl, I thought I implied that your solution worked! It did indeed and
I was able to import my .CSV file. Many thanks for your insight. I will have a look at your website, as I am not sure what you guys do. CHeers. EB "Karl Timmermans" wrote: Just curious if you're still reading this thread- have you been able to import your info once the "idiosyncracies" were dealt with? Would really like to know (preferably by emailing me directly). I don't email anyone as a matter of practice from this forum for any reason unless personally contacted first (all kinds of business reasons for that including potential SPAM complaints - those of you that have contacted me know that you'll get responded to honestly one way or the other and if our product doesn't fit, we'll be the first to tell you - not interested in unhappy customers). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... No Kral, we are speaking the same language. I was indeed referring to dragging the "source" header row fields to the righthand window. If for instance, I remove "Title" from the expanded Name, and replace it with the srouce "Titre" from my header row, it disappears when I click OK. Just as you pointed out... Cheers. "Karl Timmermans" wrote: Just to make sure we're on the same page, the original response I posted is based on your Excel file having a "header row" (each column in the first row represents the field name for the columns in all the rows that follow it). Little confused about what you mean by "dragging your source field" which could mean either dragging the appropriate field name or if you don't have a header row - you would then be dragging actual data (not recommended). If the latter is the case then add a header row to your Excel file first and go thru the process again taking into account everything I described in the initial response. Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Thanks for your input Karl! The thing is freaky, Lord knows why they don't fix, with all the money the company sucks in! I will try what you say (I removed the TO fields and they dissapear, unless I try and darg the source fields in, in which case they go back to the default fields. CHeers. EB "Karl Timmermans" wrote: The problem you're describing goes as follows: #1 - Map any field from your source to any of the individual sub name fields (i.e. First Name etc) #2 - Click OK and then immediately open up the "Map To Custom Fields" screen again before clicking on Finish. #3 - The fields you've mapped in step #1 get replaced with Outlook's own field name. This only occurs if you've mapped a field to it otherwise the mapping of the field stays blank when you open up this page a second time. This has nothing to do with the language and is also not just an Outlook '2002 issue - does the same thing in O'2003. Having said all of that - if you ignore the fact that Outlook shows the target field name instead of your source field name on subsequent visits to the mapping page - the field you mapped in step #1 will end up where you want it to go. This is equally true if you close Outlook, restart it, and perform the import again with no changes to the last mapping set. Even though the name that displays on the list is incorrect, the field you originally mapped will be used for the import. One caveat that you should be aware of in terms of the name sub fields. These are used to construct the full name field so don't map to the full name AND individual parts of it. Map to one or the other (i.e. Name versus FirstName - Last Name) but not both. Same thing applies to the street address fields (Business, Home, Other). Karl -- __________________________________________ Karl Timmermans - The Claxton Group ContactGenie - Importer 1.3 / DataPorter 2.0 "Power contact importers for MS Outlook '2000/2003" http://www.contactgenie.com "ericb" wrote in message ... Hi guys. Looks like Karl is the emmient specialist on this subjet matter, so here goes! I am trying to import an Excel.cvs file with contacts into Outlook 2002. When I get to the custom fields map wizard, the fields where I click on "+" to expand (Name, for instance) don't take the field I map from when I click OK to save. There is no problem with the fields that don't expand, the map is saved. The .cvs file to be mapped has fields in French and Outlook is in English, but since the unexpandable fields don't pose a problem, that can't be the issue. I can't figure it out... -- Cheers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upgrading from Outlook 2002 (XP) to Outlook 2003 lost saved email. | Catherine | General Discussion | 2 | August 28th, 2004 04:10 PM |
Exporting a range of cells in Excel to Outlook 2003 | DennisF | Contacts | 8 | July 22nd, 2004 08:36 AM |
HELP!! Outlook's Misbehaving-Ways: Viewing Email Appears Impossibl | RunningHoove | Installation & Setup | 1 | July 9th, 2004 04:13 PM |
user defined fields in outlook and Palm imports | Steve Cooper | Contacts | 0 | July 9th, 2004 03:03 AM |
Mapping to User Defined Fields | David | Contacts | 6 | June 18th, 2004 08:01 PM |