A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Access » General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Access 2003 and DFS file system



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 14th, 2008, 07:14 PM posted to microsoft.public.access
MrDeej
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Access 2003 and DFS file system

Hello!

My IT-department just upgraded to DFS instead of a single fileserver. Is
there any issues i should now of with having an Access database on a DFS
network space?
  #2  
Old December 14th, 2008, 07:35 PM posted to microsoft.public.access
Daniel Pineault
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 658
Default Access 2003 and DFS file system

No, when we made the change had no impact whatsoever. You may need to relink
your tables, but that should be the extent of it.
--
Hope this helps,

Daniel Pineault
http://www.cardaconsultants.com/
For Access Tips and Examples: http://www.devhut.net
Please rate this post using the vote buttons if it was helpful.



"MrDeej" wrote:

Hello!

My IT-department just upgraded to DFS instead of a single fileserver. Is
there any issues i should now of with having an Access database on a DFS
network space?

  #3  
Old December 15th, 2008, 12:15 PM posted to microsoft.public.access
Paul Shapiro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 635
Default Access 2003 and DFS file system

I haven't tried putting the backend db on a DFS share, but if you have
multiple DFS hosts with users simultaneously attached to more than one host,
I would be worried about concurrency issues and file conflicts. I don't see
how Access, which is a file share database, could work successfully this
way.

I see that Daniel reports it works fine, but I would think it only works
fine if you have a single DFS host. Daniel, did you have multiple file hosts
with users connecting to the different hosts simultaneously?

"Daniel Pineault" wrote in
message ...
No, when we made the change had no impact whatsoever. You may need to
relink
your tables, but that should be the extent of it.
--
Hope this helps,

Daniel Pineault
http://www.cardaconsultants.com/
For Access Tips and Examples: http://www.devhut.net


"MrDeej" wrote:

Hello!

My IT-department just upgraded to DFS instead of a single fileserver. Is
there any issues i should now of with having an Access database on a DFS
network space?


  #4  
Old December 16th, 2008, 03:20 PM posted to microsoft.public.access
a a r o n . k e m p f @ g m a i l . c o m
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,108
Default Access 2003 and DFS file system

wow-- you're friggin crazy dude
SQL Server works great over any network, don't let these kids blame
DFS!

if Jet doesn't fit into your network infrastructure, then you should
move to SQL Server (and hopefully ADP).

Jet doesn't work over WAN, VPN, LAN, Wireless-- Jet doesn't work over
anything invented in the past 50 years.
What makes you think that it would be flawless on DFS?

Jet just isnt' reliable enough for real developers.

-Aaron
MCITP: DBA SQL 2005


On Dec 14, 11:14*am, MrDeej wrote:
Hello!

My IT-department just upgraded to DFS instead of a single fileserver. Is
there any issues i should now of with having an Access database on a DFS
network space?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.