A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Access » Database Design
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Access 2003, autonumbers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 29th, 2005, 06:49 PM posted to microsoft.public.access.tablesdbdesign
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Access 2003, autonumbers

Thanks Tina,

I was thinking about the tblGRADES before, but thinking about it now, the
grade section for the tblCOINS will only be a number. Linked to the
tblGRADES, less space in the tblCOINS.

For the grading, I have 15 grading specs per coin. (poor), (fair), (good),
(fine), (very fine), (extremely fine) are just a few. Never the less I want
to thankyou for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Dave Hubbard

"tina" wrote:

your 3rd normal form table design looks fine to me. the only note i might
include: if you have a standard set of "grades" that you apply to all coins
(i have no idea what this would be - excellent condition, good condition,
poor condition? whatever), then you could also include a

tblGRADES
GradeID -- PK
GradeName

then instead of the Grading field in tblCOINS, use the GradeID field as a
foreign key to tblGRADES.

since you know what "grading" is (and i don't), you'll need to decide if the
above suggestion is appropriate for your database or not.

hth


"Dave Hubbard" ( donotspam ) wrote in message
...
So Chris or Tina if I'm trying to Normalize my database my tables should
look like this?

If my table in 1NF is:
tblFIRST
CountryName
ContinentName
CoinID# -- PK
Denomination
Grading
ObverseDevice (picture heads side)
ReverseDevice (picture tails side)
Inscription
Motto

Then my tables in 3NF would be:
tblCONTINENT
ContinentName
ContinentID# -- PK
--------------------------
tblCOUNTRY
CountryName
CountryID# -- PK
ContinentID# -- FK to tblCONTINENT
--------------------------
tblCOINS
CoinID# -- PK
CountryID# -- FK to tblCOUNTRY
Denomination
Grading
ObverseDevice (picture heads side)
ReverseDevice (picture tails side)
Inscription
Motto
--------------------------

This way I won't have to link by the country or continent names, but by
either the CountryID# or the ContinentID#. I think this should help

minimize
the space needed to run my application.
Understanding this ACCESS 2003 is really confusing, but I'm not afraid to
try anything.

Much appreciation with any assistance,

Dave Hubbard





  #22  
Old December 30th, 2005, 01:47 AM posted to microsoft.public.access.tablesdbdesign
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Access 2003, autonumbers

you're welcome


"Dave Hubbard" ( donotspam ) wrote in message
...
Thanks Tina,

I was thinking about the tblGRADES before, but thinking about it now, the
grade section for the tblCOINS will only be a number. Linked to the
tblGRADES, less space in the tblCOINS.

For the grading, I have 15 grading specs per coin. (poor), (fair),

(good),
(fine), (very fine), (extremely fine) are just a few. Never the less I

want
to thankyou for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Dave Hubbard

"tina" wrote:

your 3rd normal form table design looks fine to me. the only note i

might
include: if you have a standard set of "grades" that you apply to all

coins
(i have no idea what this would be - excellent condition, good

condition,
poor condition? whatever), then you could also include a

tblGRADES
GradeID -- PK
GradeName

then instead of the Grading field in tblCOINS, use the GradeID field as

a
foreign key to tblGRADES.

since you know what "grading" is (and i don't), you'll need to decide if

the
above suggestion is appropriate for your database or not.

hth


"Dave Hubbard" ( donotspam ) wrote in

message
...
So Chris or Tina if I'm trying to Normalize my database my tables

should
look like this?

If my table in 1NF is:
tblFIRST
CountryName
ContinentName
CoinID# -- PK
Denomination
Grading
ObverseDevice (picture heads side)
ReverseDevice (picture tails side)
Inscription
Motto

Then my tables in 3NF would be:
tblCONTINENT
ContinentName
ContinentID# -- PK
--------------------------
tblCOUNTRY
CountryName
CountryID# -- PK
ContinentID# -- FK to tblCONTINENT
--------------------------
tblCOINS
CoinID# -- PK
CountryID# -- FK to tblCOUNTRY
Denomination
Grading
ObverseDevice (picture heads side)
ReverseDevice (picture tails side)
Inscription
Motto
--------------------------

This way I won't have to link by the country or continent names, but

by
either the CountryID# or the ContinentID#. I think this should help

minimize
the space needed to run my application.
Understanding this ACCESS 2003 is really confusing, but I'm not afraid

to
try anything.

Much appreciation with any assistance,

Dave Hubbard







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suggestion on updating Access 2000 to Access 2003 Irshad Alam General Discussion 5 August 10th, 2005 01:51 PM
What is the difference between 2002 and 2003? Red Sonya General Discussion 2 March 1st, 2005 05:10 AM
Access XP Compared to Access 2003 Mardene Leahu New Users 1 October 1st, 2004 05:11 AM
Access 2003 RK General Discussion 12 June 14th, 2004 10:16 AM
Access 2003 less functional than Access 97? George Hester General Discussion 2 June 4th, 2004 04:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.