If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
Unfortunately the Versions feature in previous versions of Word is a known
cause for document corruption and file bloat. If you never encountered this issue then consider yourself lucky. :-) They do have a replacement, sort of, if you use SharePoint you can use the Version History to view and compare versions: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sh...488601033.aspx Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... another thing i dislike is hoe the removed the "versions" feature. that feature was very usefull in word 2003. and there seems to be nothing to replace it. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
no one said anything about a file bloat...lol i know that it can make the
files a lot larger if not used right, like if you are using pictures and stuff. other than that, the text will just increase the size of the file little by little with each passing version.i just wish they continued the feature, but improved it at the same time. i used the feature all the time, from when i purchased the program in about 2003 all the way untill 2007 when i got office 2007 and i saw that hey sadly removed the feature. i still have office 2003 on one of my notebooks. after a few days of have office 20007 i took all of my (.doc) files that had versions on them and converted them so that they would not have versions on them anymore, but i still left them in (.doc) format. i have one question. if the thing is flawed then why did they take it out of office and put it into vista? it went from "versions" in office 2003 to "shadow copy" in vista. its the same consept. the odd thing was the the word system was setup better in some ways even though that some say it was unstable. i never ran into any issues with "versions" and the "shadow copy" thing in vista does not seem to work for me. its over rated and needs to be redesigned a bit. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... Unfortunately the Versions feature in previous versions of Word is a known cause for document corruption and file bloat. If you never encountered this issue then consider yourself lucky. :-) They do have a replacement, sort of, if you use SharePoint you can use the Version History to view and compare versions: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sh...488601033.aspx Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... another thing i dislike is hoe the removed the "versions" feature. that feature was very usefull in word 2003. and there seems to be nothing to replace it. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
A Shadow Copy in Vista isn't quite the same as the Versions feature. A
Shadow Copy is more of a backup utility and Word Versions are all stored in the same file, which was the primary issue and cause of corruption. A Shadow Copy creates copies of the file which, like on SharePoint, is a bit different. Another reason they removed the feature is it was seldom used according to the data they collected from those who opted into the Customer Experience Improvement Program for Office 2003. So you have a flawed feature, one that's seldom used, and two other possible "replacements" for it (SharePoint and Vista). I guess I can see why they dropped it. Now, whether Shadow Copy works as designed is another discussion entirely. ;-) Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... no one said anything about a file bloat...lol i know that it can make the files a lot larger if not used right, like if you are using pictures and stuff. other than that, the text will just increase the size of the file little by little with each passing version.i just wish they continued the feature, but improved it at the same time. i used the feature all the time, from when i purchased the program in about 2003 all the way untill 2007 when i got office 2007 and i saw that hey sadly removed the feature. i still have office 2003 on one of my notebooks. after a few days of have office 20007 i took all of my (.doc) files that had versions on them and converted them so that they would not have versions on them anymore, but i still left them in (.doc) format. i have one question. if the thing is flawed then why did they take it out of office and put it into vista? it went from "versions" in office 2003 to "shadow copy" in vista. its the same consept. the odd thing was the the word system was setup better in some ways even though that some say it was unstable. i never ran into any issues with "versions" and the "shadow copy" thing in vista does not seem to work for me. its over rated and needs to be redesigned a bit. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... Unfortunately the Versions feature in previous versions of Word is a known cause for document corruption and file bloat. If you never encountered this issue then consider yourself lucky. :-) They do have a replacement, sort of, if you use SharePoint you can use the Version History to view and compare versions: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sh...488601033.aspx Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... another thing i dislike is hoe the removed the "versions" feature. that feature was very usefull in word 2003. and there seems to be nothing to replace it. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
Thank you so much. Although this does not do everytyhing I want, I can at
least get rid of the ribbon and still get to a lot of what I use. "Andy" wrote: Although I cannot see an easy way to customise the ribbon, you can right click on an item in the ribbon and choose "Add to Quick Access toolbar". There are other ways, going into Word options (click on the office logo). You can minimise the ribbon by pressing the Ctrl key and F1 or double clicking on one of the tabs. Personally I think the new UI is such a massive improvement, I have found it easy to use straight away. A quick glance through each of the tabs was all I needed. I appreciate others are finding it not an improvement. If you need guidance on how to find something or achieve something with the new ribbon, then I am sure you will be able to get advice on that if you ask. Andy "Keith" wrote: I am a first-time Office 2007 user, and as such, I hate some of the changes I'm seeing. Perhaps that's a normal first reaction to Office 2007, and perhaps I'll grow to prefer it. But for now, it appears I'm forced to waste valuable screen real estate staring at the outrageous ribbon bar that often doesn't even have the functionality that I'm looking for. At least with Office 2003 with its regular menus I could click on one entry and hover my mouse around the others until I find what I'm looking for. And of course I could customize the toolbars to my liking, maximizing my available screen real estate. If I can do with the the ribbon, then it just isn't obvious. -- Keith ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...ic.office.misc |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
I realize that, but they both let you track changes in the file. I sort of
made my own fix for the issue in the "versions" feature in word. it took a while to come up with because I had to figure out how the normal file code fit together, and the "versions" file code fit together. the fix I made it was a small add-in that slightly changed the way "versions" worked. well, it created copies within itself like normal, but everytime you created a new version it would renew the entire file and check it for simple errors. it also had easy way to split up the versions in the file if you wanted to. I was successful in making this add-in but I got help in making this feature. i wonder if i submitted it to microsoft and they tested it and they saw that it worked error free, if they would put the versions feature into word 2007. one of the reasons why the files get corrupt is because the files get to big. most of the time the corruption is due to pictures and not text in the files. I had a friend who had the issue, but I never had the issue myself. I even found a way to fix corrupted "versions" files. for not it has to be done manually. the reason why I say that a program needs to be created for the recovery of these documents is because it would be easier than how I am doing it now. right now I can use notepad to pull out text from the corrupted documents. notepad can be used to pull out basic codes for formatting codes and pictures as well, but only advanced users can deal with the pictures and text formatting. pulling the text back together is easy, I can two up to 3 or 4 layers usually. for recovery pictures a code editor is required. its only worth recovery the 1st layer of pictures if you can. if you can recover pictures, recovering the text formatting will fall into place.I never created an application for this because it is to complex for me to make and no one was interested in helping me with it. and about the shadow copy feature i kind of dislike how it only creates them when restore points are made. i do not think it should do that if you do not want them to. i think that you should be able to create your own shadow copies as well so that you do not have to reply on system restore for there creation. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... A Shadow Copy in Vista isn't quite the same as the Versions feature. A Shadow Copy is more of a backup utility and Word Versions are all stored in the same file, which was the primary issue and cause of corruption. A Shadow Copy creates copies of the file which, like on SharePoint, is a bit different. Another reason they removed the feature is it was seldom used according to the data they collected from those who opted into the Customer Experience Improvement Program for Office 2003. So you have a flawed feature, one that's seldom used, and two other possible "replacements" for it (SharePoint and Vista). I guess I can see why they dropped it. Now, whether Shadow Copy works as designed is another discussion entirely. ;-) Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... no one said anything about a file bloat...lol i know that it can make the files a lot larger if not used right, like if you are using pictures and stuff. other than that, the text will just increase the size of the file little by little with each passing version.i just wish they continued the feature, but improved it at the same time. i used the feature all the time, from when i purchased the program in about 2003 all the way untill 2007 when i got office 2007 and i saw that hey sadly removed the feature. i still have office 2003 on one of my notebooks. after a few days of have office 20007 i took all of my (.doc) files that had versions on them and converted them so that they would not have versions on them anymore, but i still left them in (.doc) format. i have one question. if the thing is flawed then why did they take it out of office and put it into vista? it went from "versions" in office 2003 to "shadow copy" in vista. its the same consept. the odd thing was the the word system was setup better in some ways even though that some say it was unstable. i never ran into any issues with "versions" and the "shadow copy" thing in vista does not seem to work for me. its over rated and needs to be redesigned a bit. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... Unfortunately the Versions feature in previous versions of Word is a known cause for document corruption and file bloat. If you never encountered this issue then consider yourself lucky. :-) They do have a replacement, sort of, if you use SharePoint you can use the Version History to view and compare versions: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sh...488601033.aspx Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... another thing i dislike is hoe the removed the "versions" feature. that feature was very usefull in word 2003. and there seems to be nothing to replace it. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
It sounds like you have quite the add-in. :-)
Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... I realize that, but they both let you track changes in the file. I sort of made my own fix for the issue in the "versions" feature in word. it took a while to come up with because I had to figure out how the normal file code fit together, and the "versions" file code fit together. the fix I made it was a small add-in that slightly changed the way "versions" worked. well, it created copies within itself like normal, but everytime you created a new version it would renew the entire file and check it for simple errors. it also had easy way to split up the versions in the file if you wanted to. I was successful in making this add-in but I got help in making this feature. i wonder if i submitted it to microsoft and they tested it and they saw that it worked error free, if they would put the versions feature into word 2007. one of the reasons why the files get corrupt is because the files get to big. most of the time the corruption is due to pictures and not text in the files. I had a friend who had the issue, but I never had the issue myself. I even found a way to fix corrupted "versions" files. for not it has to be done manually. the reason why I say that a program needs to be created for the recovery of these documents is because it would be easier than how I am doing it now. right now I can use notepad to pull out text from the corrupted documents. notepad can be used to pull out basic codes for formatting codes and pictures as well, but only advanced users can deal with the pictures and text formatting. pulling the text back together is easy, I can two up to 3 or 4 layers usually. for recovery pictures a code editor is required. its only worth recovery the 1st layer of pictures if you can. if you can recover pictures, recovering the text formatting will fall into place.I never created an application for this because it is to complex for me to make and no one was interested in helping me with it. and about the shadow copy feature i kind of dislike how it only creates them when restore points are made. i do not think it should do that if you do not want them to. i think that you should be able to create your own shadow copies as well so that you do not have to reply on system restore for there creation. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... A Shadow Copy in Vista isn't quite the same as the Versions feature. A Shadow Copy is more of a backup utility and Word Versions are all stored in the same file, which was the primary issue and cause of corruption. A Shadow Copy creates copies of the file which, like on SharePoint, is a bit different. Another reason they removed the feature is it was seldom used according to the data they collected from those who opted into the Customer Experience Improvement Program for Office 2003. So you have a flawed feature, one that's seldom used, and two other possible "replacements" for it (SharePoint and Vista). I guess I can see why they dropped it. Now, whether Shadow Copy works as designed is another discussion entirely. ;-) Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... no one said anything about a file bloat...lol i know that it can make the files a lot larger if not used right, like if you are using pictures and stuff. other than that, the text will just increase the size of the file little by little with each passing version.i just wish they continued the feature, but improved it at the same time. i used the feature all the time, from when i purchased the program in about 2003 all the way untill 2007 when i got office 2007 and i saw that hey sadly removed the feature. i still have office 2003 on one of my notebooks. after a few days of have office 20007 i took all of my (.doc) files that had versions on them and converted them so that they would not have versions on them anymore, but i still left them in (.doc) format. i have one question. if the thing is flawed then why did they take it out of office and put it into vista? it went from "versions" in office 2003 to "shadow copy" in vista. its the same consept. the odd thing was the the word system was setup better in some ways even though that some say it was unstable. i never ran into any issues with "versions" and the "shadow copy" thing in vista does not seem to work for me. its over rated and needs to be redesigned a bit. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... Unfortunately the Versions feature in previous versions of Word is a known cause for document corruption and file bloat. If you never encountered this issue then consider yourself lucky. :-) They do have a replacement, sort of, if you use SharePoint you can use the Version History to view and compare versions: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sh...488601033.aspx Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... another thing i dislike is hoe the removed the "versions" feature. that feature was very usefull in word 2003. and there seems to be nothing to replace it. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
yea i do, thanks.
"Beth Melton" wrote in message ... It sounds like you have quite the add-in. :-) Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... I realize that, but they both let you track changes in the file. I sort of made my own fix for the issue in the "versions" feature in word. it took a while to come up with because I had to figure out how the normal file code fit together, and the "versions" file code fit together. the fix I made it was a small add-in that slightly changed the way "versions" worked. well, it created copies within itself like normal, but everytime you created a new version it would renew the entire file and check it for simple errors. it also had easy way to split up the versions in the file if you wanted to. I was successful in making this add-in but I got help in making this feature. i wonder if i submitted it to microsoft and they tested it and they saw that it worked error free, if they would put the versions feature into word 2007. one of the reasons why the files get corrupt is because the files get to big. most of the time the corruption is due to pictures and not text in the files. I had a friend who had the issue, but I never had the issue myself. I even found a way to fix corrupted "versions" files. for not it has to be done manually. the reason why I say that a program needs to be created for the recovery of these documents is because it would be easier than how I am doing it now. right now I can use notepad to pull out text from the corrupted documents. notepad can be used to pull out basic codes for formatting codes and pictures as well, but only advanced users can deal with the pictures and text formatting. pulling the text back together is easy, I can two up to 3 or 4 layers usually. for recovery pictures a code editor is required. its only worth recovery the 1st layer of pictures if you can. if you can recover pictures, recovering the text formatting will fall into place.I never created an application for this because it is to complex for me to make and no one was interested in helping me with it. and about the shadow copy feature i kind of dislike how it only creates them when restore points are made. i do not think it should do that if you do not want them to. i think that you should be able to create your own shadow copies as well so that you do not have to reply on system restore for there creation. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... A Shadow Copy in Vista isn't quite the same as the Versions feature. A Shadow Copy is more of a backup utility and Word Versions are all stored in the same file, which was the primary issue and cause of corruption. A Shadow Copy creates copies of the file which, like on SharePoint, is a bit different. Another reason they removed the feature is it was seldom used according to the data they collected from those who opted into the Customer Experience Improvement Program for Office 2003. So you have a flawed feature, one that's seldom used, and two other possible "replacements" for it (SharePoint and Vista). I guess I can see why they dropped it. Now, whether Shadow Copy works as designed is another discussion entirely. ;-) Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... no one said anything about a file bloat...lol i know that it can make the files a lot larger if not used right, like if you are using pictures and stuff. other than that, the text will just increase the size of the file little by little with each passing version.i just wish they continued the feature, but improved it at the same time. i used the feature all the time, from when i purchased the program in about 2003 all the way untill 2007 when i got office 2007 and i saw that hey sadly removed the feature. i still have office 2003 on one of my notebooks. after a few days of have office 20007 i took all of my (.doc) files that had versions on them and converted them so that they would not have versions on them anymore, but i still left them in (.doc) format. i have one question. if the thing is flawed then why did they take it out of office and put it into vista? it went from "versions" in office 2003 to "shadow copy" in vista. its the same consept. the odd thing was the the word system was setup better in some ways even though that some say it was unstable. i never ran into any issues with "versions" and the "shadow copy" thing in vista does not seem to work for me. its over rated and needs to be redesigned a bit. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... Unfortunately the Versions feature in previous versions of Word is a known cause for document corruption and file bloat. If you never encountered this issue then consider yourself lucky. :-) They do have a replacement, sort of, if you use SharePoint you can use the Version History to view and compare versions: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sh...488601033.aspx Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email cannot be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton Microsoft Office MVP Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out: http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook Word FAQ: http://mvps.org/word TechTrax eZine: http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/ MVP FAQ site: http://mvps.org/ "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... another thing i dislike is hoe the removed the "versions" feature. that feature was very usefull in word 2003. and there seems to be nothing to replace it. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
Hi Steven,
To add a bit to what Beth mentioned - the Word versions feature wasn't considered widely used, was limited to Word documents and not easily expanded to the model deemed needed for project/document collaboration and workflow management for multiple application documents. The Word versions feature was not the only collaboration related one in Word that changed in Office 2007 to use the new Office server product (such as sharepoint) models for collaboration and document version/history tracking. The document corruption issues were a part of it, but likely more that folks didn't understand its use very well (i.e. 'why is my file so big' and 'I can't this by email', 'the file takes a long time to open/save to the network', etc). The issues you discovered that you were able to help with are certainly interesting. Your add-in would certainly seem to be useful if you were to make it available to those folks who continue to work with pre-Office 2007 versions. =========================== "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... no one said anything about a file bloat...lol i know that it can make the files a lot larger if not used right, like if you are using pictures and stuff. other than that, the text will just increase the size of the file little by little with each passing version.i just wish they continued the feature, but improved it at the same time. i used the feature all the time, from when i purchased the program in about 2003 all the way untill 2007 when i got office 2007 and i saw that hey sadly removed the feature. i still have office 2003 on one of my notebooks. after a few days of have office 20007 i took all of my (.doc) files that had versions on them and converted them so that they would not have versions on them anymore, but i still left them in (.doc) format. i have one question. if the thing is flawed then why did they take it out of office and put it into vista? it went from "versions" in office 2003 to "shadow copy" in vista. its the same consept. the odd thing was the the word system was setup better in some ways even though that some say it was unstable. i never ran into any issues with "versions" and the "shadow copy" thing in vista does not seem to work for me. its over rated and needs to be redesigned a bit. -- Bob Buckland ?:-) MS Office System Products MVP *Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big dividends* |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
i miay deploy it. the only thing is that it does not work with office 2003
when the application is installed under Windows vista. it needs to be used under Windows XP. the reason why it does not work under vista is because of the language i wrote it in. i used that language for other add-ins as well, but those add-ins were for the OS. the language does not seem to be compatible with applications that were made after 2005. i may just take a class for .net framework programing and rewrite the add-in so that it will be in a more up to date language. i may also make other changes to it as well, like extracting the whole "versions" feature out of word 2003 so that if people want to use it in word 2007 they can. after i do that, then i will deploy it to the public. right now, i'm now i'm not even sure if it will work in XP SP3 office 2003 SP3 since i am using office 2007 SP1 at the moment. "Bob Buckland ?:-)" 75214.226(At Beautiful Downtown)compuserve.com wrote in message ... Hi Steven, To add a bit to what Beth mentioned - the Word versions feature wasn't considered widely used, was limited to Word documents and not easily expanded to the model deemed needed for project/document collaboration and workflow management for multiple application documents. The Word versions feature was not the only collaboration related one in Word that changed in Office 2007 to use the new Office server product (such as sharepoint) models for collaboration and document version/history tracking. The document corruption issues were a part of it, but likely more that folks didn't understand its use very well (i.e. 'why is my file so big' and 'I can't this by email', 'the file takes a long time to open/save to the network', etc). The issues you discovered that you were able to help with are certainly interesting. Your add-in would certainly seem to be useful if you were to make it available to those folks who continue to work with pre-Office 2007 versions. =========================== "Steven Wabik" wrote in message ... no one said anything about a file bloat...lol i know that it can make the files a lot larger if not used right, like if you are using pictures and stuff. other than that, the text will just increase the size of the file little by little with each passing version.i just wish they continued the feature, but improved it at the same time. i used the feature all the time, from when i purchased the program in about 2003 all the way untill 2007 when i got office 2007 and i saw that hey sadly removed the feature. i still have office 2003 on one of my notebooks. after a few days of have office 20007 i took all of my (.doc) files that had versions on them and converted them so that they would not have versions on them anymore, but i still left them in (.doc) format. i have one question. if the thing is flawed then why did they take it out of office and put it into vista? it went from "versions" in office 2003 to "shadow copy" in vista. its the same consept. the odd thing was the the word system was setup better in some ways even though that some say it was unstable. i never ran into any issues with "versions" and the "shadow copy" thing in vista does not seem to work for me. its over rated and needs to be redesigned a bit. -- Bob Buckland ?:-) MS Office System Products MVP *Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big dividends* |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
I hate the ribbon -- bring the menus back!
RIBBON acronym
Real Idiocy By Bungling Obnoxious Nitwits "JoAnn Paules" wrote: Not a Microsoft smartie. I'm just an end user like yourself. And I didn't pull anything out of any body cavity. -- JoAnn Paules MVP Microsoft [Publisher] ~~~~~ How to ask a question http://support.microsoft.com/KB/555375 "kramer2718" wrote in message ... JoAnn Paules;2890415 Wrote: Microsoft focused on a few of the products - the ones more heavily used. Publisher doesn't have it either - or Visio. Be thankful that you have a few programs that still look the same. By the time the other programs get the ribbon, you'll be an old pro with it. Or I'll just use Open Office or Google's products... Let me ask you MS smarties something. When you designed the ribbon, did you consider, the complicated search pattern that your eyes have to do to find options in the ribbon? What about the alt-[1st key in menu name] pattern? Did you just pull this thing out of your ---? -- kramer2718 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kramer2718's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=41051 View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=756580 http://forums.techarena.in |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bring back the office short cut bar! | Shortcut Champion | General Discussions | 24 | August 20th, 2006 10:11 AM |
VBA can't bring back Like '*active*' records | [email protected] | Using Forms | 1 | March 9th, 2006 05:21 PM |
can I bring back an older version of a saved execl spreadsheet | lapp204 | Worksheet Functions | 2 | February 12th, 2006 05:40 AM |
Bring back NetFolders for Outlook so I can synch with other users. | NetFolders fan | Contacts | 1 | November 17th, 2004 02:10 PM |