If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Access Version?
Does anyone know if a new version of Access is due to come out anytime soon?
Thanks, Neil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Neil,
I know the Microsoft team is hard at work on the next version, since I've had the privilege of being on a small team of users that gets to preview new features and provide input. However, I have not heard of any anticipated RTM (Release to Manufacturing) schedule yet. Tom _________________________________ "Neil Ginsberg" wrote in message nk.net... Does anyone know if a new version of Access is due to come out anytime soon? Thanks, Neil |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Tom. We're using A2000 now and are considering upgrading to A2003.
Any thoughts on that, as opposed to waiting for the next version? Neil "Tom Wickerath" wrote in message ... Hi Neil, I know the Microsoft team is hard at work on the next version, since I've had the privilege of being on a small team of users that gets to preview new features and provide input. However, I have not heard of any anticipated RTM (Release to Manufacturing) schedule yet. Tom _________________________________ "Neil Ginsberg" wrote in message nk.net... Does anyone know if a new version of Access is due to come out anytime soon? Thanks, Neil |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:46:49 GMT, "Neil Ginsberg" wrote:
Thanks Tom. We're using A2000 now and are considering upgrading to A2003. Any thoughts on that, as opposed to waiting for the next version? Neil Access 2003 offers no compelling improvements over Access 2002(XP). If you are using Access 2002, I would not bother upgrading right now unless you were upgrading MS Office anyway. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I wrote we're using Access 2000, not 2002. I agree re. 2002/2003.
Neil "Steve Jorgensen" wrote in message ... On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:46:49 GMT, "Neil Ginsberg" wrote: Thanks Tom. We're using A2000 now and are considering upgrading to A2003. Any thoughts on that, as opposed to waiting for the next version? Neil Access 2003 offers no compelling improvements over Access 2002(XP). If you are using Access 2002, I would not bother upgrading right now unless you were upgrading MS Office anyway. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Neil Ginsberg" wrote in message news I wrote we're using Access 2000, not 2002. I agree re. 2002/2003. Neil, I haven't seen anything new and great since A97. (A2 was 16 bit and A95 was a piece of junk.) I keep upgrading because all my customers upgrade. I think A97 was a real breakthrough in reliability. I'm not particularly impressed with ADO, the ASP pages or any of this newer stuff. Unless you have a specific reason to upgrade I would suggest that you stay with what you have. There have been some nice incremental improvements. For example, if you change the name of a query, and you have a report based on that query, the report will automatically updated to reflect the changed name. That's a nice feature -- renaming objects used to be so difficult. (There are some drawbacks too. The name game is best avoided.) Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Neil Ginsberg" wrote in message
nk.net... Does anyone know if a new version of Access is due to come out anytime soon? I think you'll find that both Access 2002 and 2003 are significantly more reliable, especially during development, than Access 2000. Access 2003 has slightly better help files than 2002, both of which are better than 2000, BUT not as good as Access 97. Access 2003 does not have an index on it's help files, and by default wants to connect you to the Internet to get help. A 2003 has solved the Name AutoCorrect bug and fixed some of the other corruption bugs that plague A2000. I think either A2002 or A2003 is a worthwhile upgrade. Access 12 (the next version) will have some nice features, but won't be out for some time, so you may not want to wait. -- Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP Microsoft Access Free Access Downloads http://www.datastrat.com http://www.mvps.org/access |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Arvin Meyer" wrote:
I think you'll find that both Access 2002 and 2003 are significantly more reliable, especially during development, than Access 2000. Agreed. I found that doing work in A2000 a form would corrupt about once a week or so. A2003 hasn't had this problem at all. Also I really like the smart tags Access pops up on the controls. For example I added some &s to some unassociated labels. Access promptly tells me they're unassociated and gives me an option to associate the label to a control. Nice. Or if you've renamed fields in the tables the controls based on the old names are obviously incorrect. Now a little triangle appears in the corner. Again nice. Created my first report and I see a little flag in that little grey box in the upper left hand corner of the report. I click on it and see a "Common Report Error" "Report width is greater than page width" with a bunch of options. Very nice. I can see how this would help the newbie/itinerant Access users. I also see lots of flags for the label controls in the headers. Someone spent some time on these little touches. Tony -- Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can read the entire thread of messages. Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:16:14 GMT, Tony Toews wrote:
"Arvin Meyer" wrote: I think you'll find that both Access 2002 and 2003 are significantly more reliable, especially during development, than Access 2000. Agreed. I found that doing work in A2000 a form would corrupt about once a week or so. A2003 hasn't had this problem at all. Just one warning, though. Open a database with VBA code in A2003, then open it again in XP, and it's corrupted for sure. If you go to A2K3, be sure to do all users at once! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Jorgensen" wrote in message
... Just one warning, though. Open a database with VBA code in A2003, then open it again in XP, and it's corrupted for sure. If you go to A2K3, be sure to do all users at once! I wouldn't say "for sure" This corruption is actually quite rare. It is alleviated by compiling 2002 databases before saving, or not using both to develop. I have never seen this corruption except during development. -- Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP Microsoft Access Free Access downloads: http://www.datastrat.com http://www.mvps.org/access |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running Spanish Access application into English version | Joseph | New Users | 0 | December 15th, 2004 10:15 AM |
Is MS Access XP Version compatible to Visual Basic 6 ? | rock72 | General Discussion | 2 | December 6th, 2004 06:42 PM |
is Access 2003 any better than XP? | Gorb | General Discussion | 4 | November 11th, 2004 09:44 PM |
is Access 2003 any better than XP? | Gorb | Using Forms | 2 | November 11th, 2004 09:20 AM |
Access XP Compared to Access 2003 | Mardene Leahu | New Users | 1 | October 1st, 2004 05:11 AM |