If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
change Display As in all Contacts outlook 2003
All Sent messages are sorted for me by the Display As field. This is a
pain when you are mixing personal contacts with a global address book, where the personal contacts show up First Last and the global show up Last, First. Add to that the fact that MS keeps changing the format of the Display As field with each new version, and everything is jumbled together with no consistency. I suppose this would be less of a problem if you could sort your messages alphabetically on a field other than "Display As", but I haven't found a way to do that. This is something that MS clearly needs to address in the next version of Outlook. The "File As" option for sorting contacts was a good start, but it only does half the job. Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] wrote: I haven't seen anyone that's written any code samples to do this either. It 's not a very frequent request since the Display As field is of so little consequence. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Data Design" wrote in message t.net... Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] wrote: No way to do so unless you want to write code. shame.. Im not a coder, and in the long run may be quicker to do it manually rather than try and code it. Sue |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You should be able to add any field you want to the columns in your Sent
Items Folder, then sort by that field. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "HurricaneDavid" wrote in message oups.com... All Sent messages are sorted for me by the Display As field. This is a pain when you are mixing personal contacts with a global address book, where the personal contacts show up First Last and the global show up Last, First. Add to that the fact that MS keeps changing the format of the Display As field with each new version, and everything is jumbled together with no consistency. I suppose this would be less of a problem if you could sort your messages alphabetically on a field other than "Display As", but I haven't found a way to do that. This is something that MS clearly needs to address in the next version of Outlook. The "File As" option for sorting contacts was a good start, but it only does half the job. Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] wrote: I haven't seen anyone that's written any code samples to do this either. It 's not a very frequent request since the Display As field is of so little consequence. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Data Design" wrote in message t.net... Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] wrote: No way to do so unless you want to write code. shame.. Im not a coder, and in the long run may be quicker to do it manually rather than try and code it. Sue |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What other address fields similar to "from" would produce the desired
effect? I'm not finding any. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You've lost me. Why would you need the from field in the Sent Items folder?
You already know who sent the messages. I don't understand what you need to do. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "HurricaneDavid" wrote in message oups.com... What other address fields similar to "from" would produce the desired effect? I'm not finding any. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I mean the "To" field in the Sent folder. If you sort by the "To"
field, the messages are not sorted consistently. For example, messages sent to John Doe could show up with 3 different results in the "To" field: "Doe, John", "John Doe", and ". The crux of the problem IS the "Display as" field, which has changed throughout Outlook's existence. MS needs to find a way to let the user customize the default "Display as" format, if they are going to pre-populate it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
There is no one single source for the Display As field. It is a derived
field so it will never have a consistent format. It may well take its format from the email header of a message to which you are replying. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "HurricaneDavid" wrote in message oups.com... I mean the "To" field in the Sent folder. If you sort by the "To" field, the messages are not sorted consistently. For example, messages sent to John Doe could show up with 3 different results in the "To" field: "Doe, John", "John Doe", and ". The crux of the problem IS the "Display as" field, which has changed throughout Outlook's existence. MS needs to find a way to let the user customize the default "Display as" format, if they are going to pre-populate it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mail merge | Tim Chavez | Contacts | 15 | March 16th, 2005 05:11 AM |
Display WinXP Address Book in Last Name Order | Dennis Boone | Contacts | 13 | December 16th, 2004 12:23 AM |
Outlook 2003 contacts default folder change | J Roberts | General Discussions | 2 | November 20th, 2004 06:55 PM |
Outlook 2003 Contacts folder errors | Fred | General Discussion | 0 | September 21st, 2004 10:55 PM |
Two versions again-language issue | Otto | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 3 | May 28th, 2004 04:57 AM |