If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Word 2000 Tables & Mail Merge
I have placed a table within a merge document. The cells in the table have
merge fields in them. When an entire row within the table does NOT have any data from the merge fields, I'd like the rows underneath to pull up, making the table have less rows...similar to the mail merge function where blank lines don't print. Will the tables function do that in Word 2000? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Word 2000 Tables & Mail Merge
Hi =?Utf-8?B?QmV0c3lD?=,
I have placed a table within a merge document. The cells in the table have merge fields in them. When an entire row within the table does NOT have any data from the merge fields, I'd like the rows underneath to pull up, making the table have less rows...similar to the mail merge function where blank lines don't print. Will the tables function do that in Word 2000? No, there's nothing in mail merge that will hide entire table rows. If you were doing a catalog merge, then you'd set up just one row with merge fields. You'd filter the data source to leave out the records that would generate empty rows. Other than that, you'd have to process the merge result after the merge... But I have to wonder if what you're doing is a "one-to-many" type of merge? In that case, there are ways to get what you want, but you'd probably have to restructure how the data is stored. Cindy Meister INTER-Solutions, Switzerland http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 17 2005) http://www.word.mvps.org This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|