If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How do I typset a document in Word 2003?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You don't. Word isn't a typesetting program. You can format a document that
you intend to distribute multiple copies of, but how you format it depends on what you want. By the way, you should put your question and relevant details in the big space provided for it, rather than just use the subject line. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I use it for typesetting--in the sense that I use it to create
camera-ready copy for producing books and other published materials. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Daiya Mitchell" wrote in message .. . You don't. Word isn't a typesetting program. You can format a document that you intend to distribute multiple copies of, but how you format it depends on what you want. By the way, you should put your question and relevant details in the big space provided for it, rather than just use the subject line. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Very true. We can equally well call that formatting, though. To me,
typesetting implies a number of extra things--ligatures, page layout, etc, that Word doesn't do, and that trying to get it to do will just make one unhappy. Granted, had there been some details about what the OP meant by "typeset", I would probably not have quibbled over it. On 4/20/05 3:49 PM, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Well, I use it for typesetting--in the sense that I use it to create camera-ready copy for producing books and other published materials. You don't. Word isn't a typesetting program. You can format a document that you intend to distribute multiple copies of, but how you format it depends on what you want. By the way, you should put your question and relevant details in the big space provided for it, rather than just use the subject line. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Suzanne,
Do you create PDFs from the Word files? Or PostScript print files? If not, the publisher would need to have exactly the same setup as you = (Word version, fonts, printer driver)? Regards, Klaus "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Well, I use it for typesetting--in the sense that I use it to create camera-ready copy for producing books and other published=20 materials. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Daiya Mitchell" wrote:
Very true. We can equally well call that formatting, though. =20 To me, typesetting implies a number of extra things--ligatures,=20 page layout, etc, that Word doesn't do, and that trying to get it=20 to do will just make one unhappy. =20 Granted, had there been some details about what the OP meant by=20 "typeset", I would probably not have quibbled over it. Hi Daya, Nobody I know uses ligatures, and I'd very much disagree about page = layout. Word beats Quark and Indesign by lengths in layout options IMO (tables, = frames, text boxes, the ability to automate tedious layout tasks with = macros). Usually, given certain layout specifications, I would usually think I'd = get the desired result in Word in a fraction of the time, and I'd = probably wouldn't have to mess with the text at all. In DTP programs, I'd often need to mangle the text heavily, which makes = it completely worthless for re-use. Main reasons to use DTP programs, I think, are color separation and = typographic quality (not too good in Word because the placement of = characters isn't as exact, and the line breaking algorithms are worse = and don't offer much customization). Regards, Klaus |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Since you are the professional, I totally withdraw my comment.
Daiya On 4/20/05 8:01 PM, "Klaus Linke" wrote: "Daiya Mitchell" wrote: Very true. We can equally well call that formatting, though. To me, typesetting implies a number of extra things--ligatures, page layout, etc, that Word doesn't do, and that trying to get it to do will just make one unhappy. Granted, had there been some details about what the OP meant by "typeset", I would probably not have quibbled over it. Hi Daya, Nobody I know uses ligatures, and I'd very much disagree about page layout. Word beats Quark and Indesign by lengths in layout options IMO (tables, frames, text boxes, the ability to automate tedious layout tasks with macros). Usually, given certain layout specifications, I would usually think I'd get the desired result in Word in a fraction of the time, and I'd probably wouldn't have to mess with the text at all. In DTP programs, I'd often need to mangle the text heavily, which makes it completely worthless for re-use. Main reasons to use DTP programs, I think, are color separation and typographic quality (not too good in Word because the placement of characters isn't as exact, and the line breaking algorithms are worse and don't offer much customization). Regards, Klaus |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You're no fun to play with today ;-)
I guess some other professionals will flame me for the heresy... BTW, usually I don't use the word "usually" so much (I hope). Regards, Klaus "Daiya Mitchell" wrote: Since you are the professional, I totally withdraw my comment. =20 Daiya =20 =20 On 4/20/05 8:01 PM, "Klaus Linke" wrote: =20 "Daiya Mitchell" wrote: Very true. We can equally well call that formatting, though. To me, typesetting implies a number of extra things--ligatures, page layout, etc, that Word doesn't do, and that trying to get it to do will just make one unhappy. =20 Granted, had there been some details about what the OP meant by "typeset", I would probably not have quibbled over it. =20 =20 =20 Hi Daya, =20 Nobody I know uses ligatures, and I'd very much disagree about page = layout. =20 Word beats Quark and Indesign by lengths in layout options IMO = (tables, frames, text boxes, the ability to automate tedious layout tasks = with macros). Usually, given certain layout specifications, I would usually think = I'd get the desired result in Word in a fraction of the time, and I'd = probably wouldn't have to mess with the text at all. In DTP programs, I'd often need to mangle the text heavily, which = makes it completely worthless for re-use. =20 Main reasons to use DTP programs, I think, are color separation and typographic quality (not too good in Word because the placement of = characters isn't as exact, and the line breaking algorithms are worse and don't = offer much customization). =20 Regards, Klaus |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
As I said, they're camera-ready; I provide hard copy. I can theoretically
provide PDFs now, but so far I mostly haven't needed to. Most of what I do is stuff that will be taken to a quick printer (like Kinko's) or sent to an old-fashioned commercial printer using offset presses. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Klaus Linke" wrote in message ... Hi Suzanne, Do you create PDFs from the Word files? Or PostScript print files? If not, the publisher would need to have exactly the same setup as you (Word version, fonts, printer driver)? Regards, Klaus "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Well, I use it for typesetting--in the sense that I use it to create camera-ready copy for producing books and other published materials. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ah, I thought you only used the term out of old habit :-)
Klaus "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: As I said, they're camera-ready; I provide hard copy. I can = theoretically provide PDFs now, but so far I mostly haven't needed to. Most of what = I do is stuff that will be taken to a quick printer (like Kinko's) or sent = to an old-fashioned commercial printer using offset presses. =20 --=20 Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the = newsgroup so all may benefit. =20 "Klaus Linke" wrote in message ... Hi Suzanne, =20 Do you create PDFs from the Word files? Or PostScript print files? =20 If not, the publisher would need to have exactly the same setup as you = (Word version, fonts, printer driver)? =20 Regards, Klaus =20 =20 =20 "Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote: Well, I use it for typesetting--in the sense that I use it to create camera-ready copy for producing books and other published materials. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Making Word do something that Wordperfect can do | NarniaUK | New Users | 4 | May 1st, 2005 10:44 PM |
Envelope Address | GR | New Users | 5 | April 24th, 2005 09:48 PM |
updating fields | lost in cincy | Mailmerge | 5 | November 18th, 2004 07:17 PM |
Word 2003 and XP performance issues | David Best | Formatting Long Documents | 4 | October 28th, 2004 06:09 PM |
word error | mac | General Discussions | 1 | May 6th, 2004 08:14 AM |