If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How can I precisely place text boxes on a form?
With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left,
right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Thanks. Jerry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Try changing the GridX and GridY numbers to smaller numbers.
-- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Thanks. Jerry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Oops... ignore my reply grid properties.... that doesn't affect the
precision of the control placement..my error. -- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Thanks. Jerry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1 twip = 0.0007"
ACCESS uses twips for alignment/size. -- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Thanks. Jerry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
By the way, you can "trick" ACCESS into the number you seek. Enter 2.3336
for the location, and ACCESS will "change' it to 2.3333. -- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Thanks. Jerry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Only because computers can't properly use a floating point unless the denominator is a power of 2 and the datatype allows a float of more than the number of places in the result. Ken's reason of division by a twip is an example. While it is close to .0007, the exact division is 1/1440 (a twip is a 1440th of an inch ... there are 72 points to the inch and 20 twips to the point). That allows for an error of up to 7 ten thousanths of an inch. (The human eye cannot resolve a difference anywhere near that) You can't count on Ken's example *always* holding true because of the rounding algorithm built into Intel chips. If your first textbox top is set a power of 2, you can set the rest at precise .25 intervals because .25 is a denominator of the power of 2 (1/4 or 360 twips) -- Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP Microsoft Access Free Access downloads: http://www.datastrat.com http://www.mvps.org/access |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I like your answer better than mine! g
-- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Arvin Meyer [MVP]" wrote in message ... "Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Only because computers can't properly use a floating point unless the denominator is a power of 2 and the datatype allows a float of more than the number of places in the result. Ken's reason of division by a twip is an example. While it is close to .0007, the exact division is 1/1440 (a twip is a 1440th of an inch ... there are 72 points to the inch and 20 twips to the point). That allows for an error of up to 7 ten thousanths of an inch. (The human eye cannot resolve a difference anywhere near that) You can't count on Ken's example *always* holding true because of the rounding algorithm built into Intel chips. If your first textbox top is set a power of 2, you can set the rest at precise .25 intervals because .25 is a denominator of the power of 2 (1/4 or 360 twips) -- Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP Microsoft Access Free Access downloads: http://www.datastrat.com http://www.mvps.org/access |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quality over quantity every time! g
-- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Fred Boer" wrote in message ... Maybe Arvin's answer was better.. but you still outnumber him 4 to 1! g,d&r Cheers! Fred Boer "Ken Snell [MVP]" wrote in message ... I like your answer better than mine! g -- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Arvin Meyer [MVP]" wrote in message ... "Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Only because computers can't properly use a floating point unless the denominator is a power of 2 and the datatype allows a float of more than the number of places in the result. Ken's reason of division by a twip is an example. While it is close to .0007, the exact division is 1/1440 (a twip is a 1440th of an inch ... there are 72 points to the inch and 20 twips to the point). That allows for an error of up to 7 ten thousanths of an inch. (The human eye cannot resolve a difference anywhere near that) You can't count on Ken's example *always* holding true because of the rounding algorithm built into Intel chips. If your first textbox top is set a power of 2, you can set the rest at precise .25 intervals because .25 is a denominator of the power of 2 (1/4 or 360 twips) -- Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP Microsoft Access Free Access downloads: http://www.datastrat.com http://www.mvps.org/access |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe Arvin's answer was better.. but you still outnumber him 4 to 1!
g,d&r Cheers! Fred Boer "Ken Snell [MVP]" wrote in message ... I like your answer better than mine! g -- Ken Snell MS ACCESS MVP "Arvin Meyer [MVP]" wrote in message ... "Jerry Crosby" wrote in message ... With snap to grid turned OFF, why can't I precisely set the top (or left, right, etc) location of a text box? I have one that I want placed at 2.3333", but Access insists on changing it to 2.3326". I've had this problem for some time and it's finally bothered me enough to submit it. Maybe a difference of .0007" isn't significant, but when you're trying to set the tops of text boxes in .25" increments it gets frustrating. Only because computers can't properly use a floating point unless the denominator is a power of 2 and the datatype allows a float of more than the number of places in the result. Ken's reason of division by a twip is an example. While it is close to .0007, the exact division is 1/1440 (a twip is a 1440th of an inch ... there are 72 points to the inch and 20 twips to the point). That allows for an error of up to 7 ten thousanths of an inch. (The human eye cannot resolve a difference anywhere near that) You can't count on Ken's example *always* holding true because of the rounding algorithm built into Intel chips. If your first textbox top is set a power of 2, you can set the rest at precise .25 intervals because .25 is a denominator of the power of 2 (1/4 or 360 twips) -- Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP Microsoft Access Free Access downloads: http://www.datastrat.com http://www.mvps.org/access |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all your help, guys. Looks like I may just put it into the
"don't fret the small stuff" category! Jerry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Linking text boxes | Volunteer Mom | Publisher | 7 | November 12th, 2008 01:29 AM |
Need Help In Printing Current Record in Specific Report | RNUSZ@OKDPS | Setting Up & Running Reports | 1 | May 16th, 2005 09:06 PM |
Outline | Renee Hendershott | Page Layout | 2 | December 25th, 2004 02:49 PM |
Dates in a listbox connected to a form... | RusCat | Using Forms | 13 | November 25th, 2004 02:31 AM |
open a form through a subform in access 2000 | Tammy | Setting Up & Running Reports | 12 | October 22nd, 2004 02:43 PM |